Funny how Trinhomeandaway only pops up when there’s trouble.

I honestly feel that age has caught up with the Trinity back rowers yet they persist in selecting Ashurst and Pitts. Batchelor and Tanginoa need to be given a sustained run with Whitbread at his natural position of 13. It’s the players not Carter…that and the club appear to be insufficiently financed hence ‘bargain basement’ buys all the time.

I agree with this.

Pitts and Ashurst are good safe pairs of hands who occasionally show up well but not often enough.

Batch and Tanginoa need to be given a chance of a few games to change things up.

I doubt after bringing in Butler there is any money left for another signing so we have to do something with what we have.

As Wayne Bennett says “if you do what you have always done, you will get what you always got”.

A back 3 in the pack of Batch, Tanginoa and Whitbread need to be given a run.

.

What's constructive about this?

'"

Indeed.
Let's be clear. They aren't investing, they are donating.

A genuine question do you know this to be true or just assuming.

'"

Constructive criticism isn't about asking questions. It is feedback that offers actionable recommendations.
This is simply pointing out an issue. He's entitled to do it but there is nothing constructive about it.

Genuine answer, as has been said above, there is no investment return on giving money to a rugby club.
Sponsoring something gets you advertising revenue, but someone putting money into the club like a Davey is not getting a return, therefore by definition they are donating money not investing money.

Well then he is obviously not the right man for the job !!
How many other buisnesses would allow the chairman to run the business like this ?
It's the role of the chairman to bring these people in it is as simple as that
Why on earth should I know any such people,I'm not in a position where I need to know these type of people,I wouldn't expect to be put in a position of authority in a proffesional sports club if I didn't have the contacts who could bring on this type of investment.

To be fair you could apply your post to most on here.

There's never been any money at belle vue its nothing new.

You make a very good point here, PT. A very unliklihood in this day and age to attract a "businessman" to "invest" in Trinity because a profit is not very likley to happen at this point in time. It's more of a Bill Gates/Richard Branson type to whom money means nothing, and could provide a"windfall" without expecting anything in return. Sadly they are few and far between (if they exist at all) . As you say a donor rather than an investor.