Harsh on Matty Wildie though who has shown up really well in all his games. If we sign Moore and stick him at 7, and then put Lee in a rotation with Rinaldi where does that leave Matty??

I watched them a few times as well and whilst you're right when you say he isn't superleague standard I would add the word YET to that. Attacking wise I think the raw materials are there they just need harnessing correctly. A fulltime time envrioment will do him the world of good in trying to achieve that. But you are certainly correct in that his defence is suspect and will need a lot of work before we see him in the first team.

Have to admit whilst I like the idea of signing an up and coming english halfback this signing would have made more sense if we were likely to be playing superleague for the next three years. Not sure how its going to benefit the player if and when we get our marching orders. And where does it leave Matty Wildie and Kieron Hyde?

Playing instead of Jeffries, but more likely vying for the interchange hooker with role Lee.

Maybe - I know what you mean, but I think the kicking game alone makes him worthy of a shot - we are lacking in that department and I think our need for a tactical kicker is greater than our need to keep Matty happy. I think he may be a victim of circumstance more than anyyhing and him making way is nothing to do with his contribution so far, he would simply be taking one for the team.

Let him compete with Jeffries and Lee maybe? Put a bit of pressure on Tommy to keep up his form back in the hooking role.

I will put pressure on Wildie to improve his kicking game because that is currently his weakness. I am yhe opinion that competition for places is a way of improving performance because if there is competition then you know that if you don't perform then you will loose your place.

No problem with that as long as that policy apply's to the senior players as well as the youngsters.

I agree it should apply to the whole squad apart from Morrison who should IMO be in the team for his leadership abilities regardless of his form.

Are you saying that AG and JE have bought a shirt company?

What a joke!!! Matty Wildie is one of the best young HALFBACKS in super league and we keep playing him at 9. He has huge potential and the sooner we move lee back to 9 and interchange with rinaldi who is looking tired(i am not surprised) and play wildie with jeffires the better we will see matty go. The signing of Gareth Moore would be a kick in the teeth to Matty as was the young warrington player we signed. Matty has waited and proved his worth in the lower grades and its time this season to let him express himself at 7, if gareth comes and and it pushes wildie straight out its a disgrace. Wildie is a wakefield lad through and through and the club should be looking to build a team around him for the next ten years. The signing of Gareth Moore would simply to me signal the clubs expectation at losing it's super league status.

I get your point but then how do you explain Hickey? A lot of mixed messages from the club at the moment.

Totally agree with this Wildie needs a start at 7 for me, and move TL to interchange hooker...

P.s. Im not Mattys agent

Would it be really? Would it really be a 'disgrace'?? Or more a misjudgment in your opinion? Strong word disgrace. One over used by people who are never seen until there is something to moan about and then everything is all of a sudden a 'disgrace'. Seems to me your reaction is completely over the top and in reality whilst it may be disappointing for wildie, even if we accept him as a very good talent I couldn't class the decision a 'disgrace'

If he is joining us, I would of thought because he's only 21 and never played a SL game and never trained full time, he will have to prove himself and if he looks better than what's already here, he'll get a chance.
I don't get this problem, that some people have, about signing new players and getting all bent out of shape because it might stop another player already here, from getting game time, but that's what it's like at all SL clubs, you make competition for places and the cream should rise. Especially at a club like ours, who already don't have enough players for key position, leading to players playing out of position and if we get a injury crisis, good help us.

As far as I am aware regardless of contract length. If you lose your super league status the player would become free to move anyway so whether it's 1 year or 2 inevitably it would result in the same outcome. I know this from Alot of cAs contracts 3 years ago. It's basically a safety net for the player.

I know, but if SL is such a lost cause why bother.