I truly like the discussion & opinions, they are correct, imo, the land has a covenant on - use for sporting activities.
The council is aware & yes smoke screen & mirrors.
Regarding access, cliff hill - balne lane has a narrow single pass bridge on a rising hill & bad bend.
The view in the air does not show the three distinct levels to the three fields, where the stadium is located is the
Largest area mid level. How visiting coaches would get through & park is mind boggling. Cut & fill in the land would
Not happen. Rain & land water moves on mass to the lowest level - the beck, which does go on flood alert.
Holdsworth mill use to have a dam adjacent for obvious reasons.
A full capacity stadium attendance would be chaos, fire issues & access a sick jokes imo.
We do have fun when the council practice to deceive, maybe they want a fiasco ?
You couldn't write a better storey.
However, I do hope Carter is aware -- Up the TRIN.

Oh give over man, get a grip.

Oh give over jinjer I thought you were better than that. Frankly I’ve lost interest in the whole thing and I don’t think it has any creedence at all.

However as far as i can see it’s the other posters with the attitude especially wren and shifty who I thought to be pretty decent. I think I know who Fisherman’s cap is and all he seemed to be doing was stating what is obvious - it is viable but unlikely.

If it is him then he’s not connected as such but he knows the industry, he was the one who told me that the plan for BV wouldn’t hold more than 6000 and he was right. Still if we don’t want advice or help then so be it I’m sure after that hostile response he won’t bother. I’ll PM him and find out.

Me I’m grateful for your kind words about me, many thanks.

Oh and I don’t own the rights to google maps either.

what concerns me is the precedent has already been set by the Council allowing the Newcold development outside the agreement, there is a legal argument that it should not have gone up but if this second one goes up outside the agreement then although a legal challenge may be brought via a JR its not plain sailing I fear, The developer has nothing to lose! If they did they would have to deliver what they promised with some legal costs on top. What about the guy at the Daily Star he may champion this latest attempt to circumvent the agreement by York Court.

Regarding planning and them set a precedent I've being thinking the same thing for some time

Surely they can't get away with it a second time!
It's absolutely outrageous

The trusts objection sets out the fact they believe the council may have acted outside of their power first time around and if they allow the latest one a judicial review will be sought.

Good move, last thing Box wants is an investigation into this whole shady saga. The only time we seem to get a response from him is when he feels threatened. Will it help get a stadium? Probably not, but if it could oust the snake somehow then there is the silver lining.

@CrossyDailyStar
Jeremy Cross, ask him.

Thanks for that I will travelling to Africa at the moment as soon as I get to some stable WiFi I will email him. Cheers for the link

I know that I have read the text but a precedent may have been set on the eyes of a court where there is no redress I am just putting potential concerns from my knowledge of Courts albeit this area is not an area I have operated in.

Go for it red white & blue but you are taking on ceramic box never mind teflon, !
The whole saga is disgusting imo.
Nothing is genuine with this guy except prevailing at all costs !