that last bit makes perfect sense.

In answer to the title question.........
The disciplinary has answered it. Both Wilkin and Amor incidents deserved a red as they received a ban.
It's just the ref didn't do anything about it.

Disciplinary guidelines15.1(b) When tackling or attempting to tackle makes contact with the head or neck of an opponent

Careless :
A-B Careless – flat hand off balance
A-B Careless - Ball carrier dips
A-B Careless - Stepped and reaching
A-B Careless – initial contact with ball or chest
A-B Careless – second tackler in – wrapping tackle up
Reckless
B-C Reckless – tackler in control
B-C Reckless – tried to tackle but reckless about outcome
Intentional
D-F Intentional – clenched fist – intent to make contact with head
D-F Intentional – stiff arm tackle – no attempt to tackle legitimately – violent

So Amor got done under - Reckless - tackler in Control and given a Grade B
How anybody can watch that video evidence and not see it as Intentional is beyond me

Roby had a clear view of it in the first place and should have dealt with it but to me looking at those guidelines and the video evidence I would say the panel need to visit the same bloody optician.

Watching Amor on Vine in slow motion without doubt shows he was punching him with venom and ref looking directly at it. Lomax - ref was actually running in the opposite direction with back to incident. I am sure a ref is supposed to have his eye on the ball ???????

Would that be his good eye or his glass eye because for Roby to miss that haymaker it must be his glass eye.

And anyone who's played the game knows that's a ridiculous way to police that kind of incident, if a player falls or ducks into a challenge that would otherwise have been perfectly legal and in no way an attempt at being high then you're penalising a totally innocent defender and in some cases putting them on report.

While I am pleased that Jon Wilkin got a 2 match ban, although he probably deserved more, I do find it ridiculous that it is other Super League teams which will benefit from his suspension and not Wakefield. At the end of the day the on report call was an easy cop out for Roby when Wilkin clearly should have been red carded. Wakefield would then have played 75 minutes against 12 men and the result could have been a lot different! Referees need to have the guts to make big calls against the big teams!

Wilkin was not put on report and we didn't even get a penalty. He was cited following the match review panel seeing it on video

Roby