Regardless of what we think of a fight, this wasn't a fight, but a cheap unjustifiable shot, that the RFL has classed as intentional.
Caution only.

Ferres (and true I haven't seen it) has got a 1 match ban for something that a lot of people watching can hardly remember. A late challenge I believe.

My 2 pennys worth,

Imo it dosent matter what the extent of the injury is, the punishment and decision should rest on the actions.

This was an unprovoked attack, a cowardly act for which he should be banned. He wasnt trying to get off the floor he punched stosic intentionally in the face, and how the RFL can say there was accidental contact with the eye, shouldnt really matter where in the face cunningham (or burger king) hit stosic, it should still represent a ban.

How he gets off scotch free, god knows. Im not angry that a saints players been let off its the consitency issue that concerns me, as i can almost guarantee latu wouldnt have got away with it. Although he can now hopefully beat, wigan, quins and huddersfield in the coming weeks, we'd all like to see that

But nothing could be more consistent. Cunningham gets away with dirty play. Again.

In that, the RFL have been perfectly consistent.

]

I'm guessing the text you accidentally inserted into the middle of my post was meant to be your reply.

FYI, it was in North West Counties League 2, we won promotion to League 1 that year.