If the council are supporting both schemes they are the ones who should get of their collective fat s and get the planning through, as I understand its applied for and sat on some penpushers desk as we bicker. Get them both built then we can argue about Rugby and not these ridiculous building sites....................................................................................................................... ner ner ner, were better than you , the scoreboard doesnt lie (sensible arguments like this one )

200 acres of Green Belt land - Nailed on public inquiry

Never trust anyone who uses the term 'nailed on'!

FFS! It's called spin.
Tony Blair and his cronies got elected to run a country on the back of it though.

You could say they're positive looking, but I'd say that once again Cas are putting out the same dross they always send out and the SL website, as ever, are too lazy to rewrite the Cas press releases. Its a copy and paste job for SL and another chance for Cas to put a cack-handed spin on very little. "Cas surpirsed at Trin"? Give over!

Keep dreaming luv, keep dreaming.

Cas are already talking about naming rights. How about the "Ray" Stadium?

All stories about Cas at the moment (now on Sky website) - who is doing the PR for them or is it just a case of Wakey getting shafted again by the media. We always seem to attract negative vibes. We really do need some more impetus.

If you give a journalist copy to fill space with, they'll print it.

time to crank up the spinning jenny that is our marketing machine

Troll gone, thread cleaned up, back to the well-oiled Cas PR machine...

You're not getting shafted by the media at all. Things will get better for you in time.

Not sure what Trinity could say on the ground front until a decision is made on planning. Anything they release now would not have anything concrete included and, as has been seen with previous statements of little substance, it will leave the club open to derision.