But what about his ties with Dewsbury ? Is he allowed to take over whilst sill sponsoring and having the ground name after them too at the Rams ?

My only concern with France is the way he pulled out of the Embassy Racing Team when money got tight. I only hope if he were successful in becoming the new owner, his commitment would extend beyond what was shown towards the racing team. RL clubs have a habit of crapping money away unless you are getting regular 12K+ attendances.

Trinity are an awful long way from that, and whoever comes in will have to be ready to stump up possibly hundreds of thousands of pounds per year until the club reach such a level.

His commitment to backing Embassy Team Racing, his own team, ran into the millions but like many other companies he pulled out when the recession hit.

Working from memory alone there were about 4 other backers/teams from the same competition that took the same decision to pull out as JF.

There were multi £million backers in the F1 circuit that made the same decision it wasn’t through lack of commitment but (ahem. . . Cough) financial prudence.

30%

If rumours are to be believed then shareholders should expect to hear something soon.

Really? So little? I always thought it was nearer the 90% mark.

I believe that's nearer the mark.

IF this is true, then i will think very carefully before selling my shares. i do not mind whoever it is having full control of the club by percentage, but one person owning it all could be dangerous.

+ if whoever it is has asked for the whole board to go (and i do not doubt the wisdom in that) isn't john kear on the board? (would please some...)??

Is that if its a hostile takeover.

If an investor just buy's Ted shares which I believe will be over 50% and takes control I do not believe he has to make a bid for the remaining shares but I'm not an expert in Company Law.

I thought that also I can see a sacking coming soon I bet they are not a nice family then

Says 90% here corporate.practicallaw.com/2-107-5970

Says 90% here corporate.practicallaw.com/2-107-5970

The last time I saw a record of the distribution of shares Ted had so many that the rest put together were useless as a voting tool. Anybody buying Teds shares wouldn't really need anybody elses. I wouldn't really want to sell mine anyway. I bought them to put some money into the club and feel a bit more involved. It's just a bit of paper now, saying I'm a shareholder, that I regard as financially worthless but in other ways priceless.

Sell you mine if you want more worthless share's.