BLM as an example, seemed the most current, I can be more obscure if you wish?

Who is being censored?

When there are 2 opposing opinions, or sources of information regarding WT, I'm gonna believe the person who is "there", not the bloke who heard it from his barbers, sisters, window cleaner.

You might be happy with simply knowing how many shirts or STs have been sold, but many others "demand" to know much more.

In reality, MC doesn't seem to come on here and share unsolicited information - he comes on to add corrections and context when some know-it-all has been spouting utter garbage.

Nobody is being censored as well you know so don't try and be smart.

The opposing opinion is that scarlet pimpernel said the CEO in his OPINION should not be coming on here using this board to leak certain things about a player as he thought it was unprofessional, the CEO had a different OPINION to this and said so, in my OPINION I agreed with scarlet pimpernel and said so, your OPINION differed to mine, so we all have different OPINIONS, so what's your problem with that? maybe the CEO has the hump on with the bloke from the chippy whose barbers sisters window cleaning boyfriend leaked it out before him
WTF are you on about!!?

YOU introduced the notion that someone was being censored, as opposed to having opinions discussed.

I stated I preferred the dialogue that our CEO provides on social media. You stress that others can have different opinions to mine, but you do this by capitalising the word opinion 6 times, to underline that you mean opinions you agree with and not the differing opinion of others!

MC came on here to correct some spurious info (not the first time), in order to correct untruths and misrepresentations that couldn't be allowed to go unchallenged.

If you don't like the forum, log off.

What spurious information, untruths and misrepresentation did I make, please enlighten me.

That’s the problem with the forum it cannot take many more leaving it just because you and others don’t like being questioned.

FFS - that's twice you've somehow made the assumption I am referencing you!

Trust me, if I mean you, I'll quote you!

Be careful you could fall foul of the moderator and I wouldn’t want such a refined contributor like you to be banned. I will ask which spurious, untruths and misrepresentations have you found in this topic.

Why would I be banned?

RE: Posts - I clearly referred to wider social media, not just here - I'm sure you know exactly which mischief has been pedalled on here and elsewhere.

As an example; the allegation that we have SL squad players on less than minimum wage.

I’m not playing tomorrow?????

I don’t mind criticism when it is backed up by facts, not assumptions or rumours. Fact is that 99.9% of stuff out there is way off the mark and has potential to cause damage, mainly mentally!

Your pushing against an open door here as I have every sympathy with the everyday problems you face, I'm not criticising you I was simply saying that everybody is entitled to an opinion, I personally have criticised old scarlet for his negativity towards you and the club in the past and no doubt will in the future, unfortunately I came up against a poster that deliberately twisted what I said which in turn made it look like I was criticising you in my response to him.

You struggle with words, don't you?

Not having a go, that wouldn't be fair, but take time to read what you type before pressing "submit".

You see I'm trying to be nice, but even that comes over as "rude".

I mean it nicely - take your time.

In an effort to save time, perhaps you'd like to point out the error of my ways, personally I don't feel you've been fair in your criticism of me but don't let that stop you in any way having a go, and no I don't struggle with words either.

Punctuation not a strong point though?