I don't care why he's on loan.

See my earlier question.

Is there absolutely no risk involved in the loan? My original post was that there is an element around the loan that makes me nervous. You've said nothing to convince me that Leeds will be not using this as an opportunity to assess if the player is a good option for next year.

I don’t care because I don’t value Aydin as an indispensable member of the squad. Of course Leeds will have a look as will we, but I’ve already answered this multiple times on what may or may not happen and now I’m bored.

Why your nervous I have no idea. Should Aydin leave or we not offer him a contract it’s a drop in the ocean and won’t be a big loss.

It’s just guessing scenarios now when in reality it’s a two week loan that benefits all parties in some way. That’s all there is too it. Just wait and see what happens.

Why you couldn't have accepted that Leeds will be taking a look from the off is completely beyond me.

As I have previously said it may well come to nothing. Let's see eh..

Why would I need to accept something that quite frankly is just common sense. How could Leeds not look at him when he’s training with and playing for them on loan, and if you actually read my previous posts you’d have noticed I had acknowledged that. The two go hand in hand. If it makes you feel better feel better then crack on.

The only time I’ll be bothered is if trinity sign him. If we don’t he can go where he likes and I won’t bat an eyelid. Have a good night.

I think Leeds will be lucky to get two points regardless of loan when you look at who is missing. Austin . Sezar. Prior. Tetavano. Newman. Leeming and maybe Hardaker. Toulouse will be rubbing their hands i think.

We are also playing a team not at full strength so we should be able to use this to our advantage, plus we will know the Toulouse score.

I reckon we also like every team in the competition, including Saints, are currently putting out a weakened side.

If for whatever reason my comments weren't eloquent/ clear enough then this article pretty much sums things up.....https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.leed ... 492271.amp

If for whatever reason my comments weren't eloquent/ clear enough then this article pretty much sums things up.....https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.leed ... 492271.amp

Sums it up perfectly Marc. Did you write it?

You are correct.
I was actually being genuine. I thought you explained it perfectly the first time. I wasn't being sarcastic.

I'm not losing any sleep over this one.
If Aydin has outstanding games for the Rhinos you'd have to be asking why he didn't do it for us, because so far he's been mediocre, as you'd probably expect from a young prop learning his trade.
As I see it, we have had all the time needed to sign this lad on a longer contract, IF it was felt he will go on and make it. So either the opinion is that there isn't a strong enough case to do that, or something has been offered but rejected.
If he hadn't gone to Leeds on loan, would he feature in this weeks starting 17 or even the squad? I doubt it so that speaks volumes to me.

In that case I'm genuinely sorry. I misinterpreted your post.