| FORUMS > Wakefield Trinity > Interesting event re proposed League Structures |
 |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 311 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2006 | 18 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2022 | Nov 2021 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Maybe the top owners are fedup with puting money in to keep clubs competative,while the RFL sit back and watch the demise.They must get sponsers if we want to go forward,if they cant,get someone who can TOP PRIORITY.
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 483 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Sep 2010 | 14 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2017 | Nov 2017 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: M62 J30 TRINITY "with minimum standards back on the cards getting moved into Newmarket ASAP is essential . Business plan back on track new stadium decent sized City we could make the grade'"
As stated by Blake Solly last night the size of stadium would not be a criteria. As long as it was safe and good enough for Sky to broadcast in HD, you could have a capacity of 5K. The fact that obviously from a business point of view NM would be better means its a must but it won't matter standards wise, Belle Vue would be good enough.
In any case Newmarket is a long way off yet i'm afraid. 5 years at least despite what some might want to tell you. |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 1886 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jun 2010 | 14 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Sep 2015 | Sep 2015 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: sixtogo "In any case Newmarket is a long way off yet i'm afraid. 5 years at least despite what some might want to tell you.'"
I disagree slightly. With the recent deal regarding the freezer plant we are much closer. The problem being is that the 106 agreement only provides £9M in funding.
We could therefore be very near to starting construction of a small stadium that could be developed and improved at a later date. However if you want to make sure all the funding is in place for a 12K stadium then yes you are correct this could be a while before sufficient financial resources are gathered.
With what was suggested last night I would prefer a start on a stadium to fit the £9M budget and then look to improve. |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 15521 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| May 2020 | May 2020 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
The RFL's latest proclamation on this is laughable; they are suggesting that their failure to market the game properly or to achieve a main sponsor is because they've been too busy micro-managing individual clubs. That has all the hallmarks of desperation and doesn't cut it with me - for example, what exactly were their commercial and marketing teams so tied up with in terms of 'micro-managing' that they were unable to deliver results in their real jobs?
Looks like interesting times ahead for the game; if this disgruntled group of SL chairmen becomes a genuine breakaway, the Sky money would quickly follow and so would the rest of the clubs, and that would be the end of the RFL.
Viva la revolution I say - it's time the sport was governed by people with the appropriate level of skill, business acumen and intelligence to extract maximum value from what is still an excellent product, but criminally under-valued.
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 9974 |  |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: bren2k "The RFL's latest proclamation on this is laughable; they are suggesting that their failure to market the game properly or to achieve a main sponsor is because they've been too busy micro-managing individual clubs. That has all the hallmarks of desperation and doesn't cut it with me - for example, what exactly were their commercial and marketing teams so tied up with in terms of 'micro-managing' that they were unable to deliver results in their real jobs?
Looks like interesting times ahead for the game; if this disgruntled group of SL chairmen becomes a genuine breakaway, the Sky money would quickly follow and so would the rest of the clubs, and that would be the end of the RFL.
Viva la revolution I say - it's time the sport was governed by people with the appropriate level of skill, business acumen and intelligence to extract maximum value from what is still an excellent product, but criminally under-valued.'"
Be careful what you wish for - if it were to be the end of the RFL then SL (or son of SL) would be IMO a closed shop of 10 or so clubs with no p and r - and we wouldn't be in it.
Top level RL would be lost to this district because of short sighted greedy chairmen.
Im no fan of the buffoons at Red Hall , but this would be disastrous for our club, district and rugby playing youth. |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 5123 |  |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2011 | 13 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Sep 2024 | Apr 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: kinleycat "Be careful what you wish for - if it were to be the end of the RFL then SL (or son of SL) would be IMO a closed shop of 10 or so clubs with no p and r - and we wouldn't be in it.
Top level RL would be lost to this district because of short sighted greedy chairmen.
Im no fan of the buffoons at Red Hall , but this would be disastrous for our club, district and rugby playing youth.'"
This^^
Bang-on.  |
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Owner | 7665 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2003 | 21 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: bren2k "The RFL's latest proclamation on this is laughable; they are suggesting that their failure to market the game properly or to achieve a main sponsor is because they've been too busy micro-managing individual clubs. That has all the hallmarks of desperation and doesn't cut it with me - for example, what exactly were their commercial and marketing teams so tied up with in terms of 'micro-managing' that they were unable to deliver results in their real jobs?
Looks like interesting times ahead for the game; if this disgruntled group of SL chairmen becomes a genuine breakaway, the Sky money would quickly follow and so would the rest of the clubs, and that would be the end of the RFL.
Viva la revolution I say - it's time the sport was governed by people with the appropriate level of skill, business acumen and intelligence to extract maximum value from what is still an excellent product, but criminally under-valued.'"
The problem for any break away group is that the RFL own the rules to the game or at least the clubs who sanction the RFL as their governing body do. If a big 10 broke away and things became acrimonious between them and the other 20+ member clubs then I doubt the 10 would be given permission to play Rugby League as we know it. |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 9974 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Ive just copied some of the text from sky sports news take on this story (it is of course acompanied by a smug picture of Woods), it readsThe shock development is an embarrassing climbdown for the governing body and threatens to undermine the credibility of RFL chief executive Nigel Wood, who was the driving force behind the policy review.
Lenagan called a meeting of Super League clubs in Warrington on Monday when it is thought they agreed to put pressure on the RFL to apply the breaks to the restructuring proposals.
The Wigan owner is concerned that the plans would weaken the financial position of Super League clubs in comparison to those in the Championship, who would receive more central funding under the reorganisation.
It is also believed Lenagan urged representatives at Monday's meeting to stick with a 14-team division, even though the Super League clubs had three times voted to go down to 12.
The proposals on the table for Wednesday's egm had been to either have straight-forward promotion and relegation between two divisions of 12 or introduce a convoluted system in which the two divisions divide into three leagues of eight after 23 rounds."
I've highlighted the bit i found most incredulous as i wasn't aware Woods had any credibility!!
It shows that there is a real threat from the powerful chairmen that can very eassily destabilise the RFL.
It shows they are not very caring for clubs out of the SL and do not wish for them to benefit financialy when we all know that the only way of making p and r work is by closing the gap between SL and the Championship and making it sustainable.
Is P and R back off the menu, despite wanting a 12 team SL are they now wanting a 14 team competition?
I think these are worrying times in the game, change may well need to come but whether everyone benefits is at the moment anyones guess.
Proceed with extreme caution!!
Full report here:
www1.skysports.com/rugby-league/ ... ring-plans |
|
Ive just copied some of the text from sky sports news take on this story (it is of course acompanied by a smug picture of Woods), it readsThe shock development is an embarrassing climbdown for the governing body and threatens to undermine the credibility of RFL chief executive Nigel Wood, who was the driving force behind the policy review.
Lenagan called a meeting of Super League clubs in Warrington on Monday when it is thought they agreed to put pressure on the RFL to apply the breaks to the restructuring proposals.
The Wigan owner is concerned that the plans would weaken the financial position of Super League clubs in comparison to those in the Championship, who would receive more central funding under the reorganisation.
It is also believed Lenagan urged representatives at Monday's meeting to stick with a 14-team division, even though the Super League clubs had three times voted to go down to 12.
The proposals on the table for Wednesday's egm had been to either have straight-forward promotion and relegation between two divisions of 12 or introduce a convoluted system in which the two divisions divide into three leagues of eight after 23 rounds."
I've highlighted the bit i found most incredulous as i wasn't aware Woods had any credibility!!
It shows that there is a real threat from the powerful chairmen that can very eassily destabilise the RFL.
It shows they are not very caring for clubs out of the SL and do not wish for them to benefit financialy when we all know that the only way of making p and r work is by closing the gap between SL and the Championship and making it sustainable.
Is P and R back off the menu, despite wanting a 12 team SL are they now wanting a 14 team competition?
I think these are worrying times in the game, change may well need to come but whether everyone benefits is at the moment anyones guess.
Proceed with extreme caution!!
Full report here:
www1.skysports.com/rugby-league/ ... ring-plans | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Chairman | 1470 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 1970 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: kinleycat "It shows that there is a real threat from the powerful chairmen that can very eassily destabilise the RFL.
It shows they are not very caring for clubs out of the SL and do not wish for them to benefit financialy when we all know that the only way of making p and r work is by closing the gap between SL and the Championship and making it sustainable.'"
This is the point, for mine. I suspect they want something similar to the Australian model, with feeder clubs who would then receive some financial support directly from the top clubs they're feeding, rather than continuing to operate as smaller, independent clubs and receiving a larger share of the funds from the RFL.
I don't know whether the British public would buy into an idea like that. It seems to contradict a lot of the values that define our sporting nation. |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 5507 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2005 | 19 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2017 | Nov 2017 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
It sounds as though we have sided with Leeds in FAVOUR of the RFL's proposals and are the only two clubs that have come out in support. There's a surprise.
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 2107 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2009 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jun 2018 | Jun 2018 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Surely now this has has come out in our current situation we'd be voting to stay 14 team sl with p&r. I think stay at 14 with 2 up 2 down from 2015 to keep everybody happy
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 4809 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jun 2005 | 19 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Mar 2016 | Nov 2015 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: RebelRebel "This is the point, for mine. I suspect they want something similar to the Australian model, with feeder clubs who would then receive some financial support directly from the top clubs they're feeding, rather than continuing to operate as smaller, independent clubs and receiving a larger share of the funds from the RFL.
I don't know whether the British public would buy into an idea like that. It seems to contradict a lot of the values that define our sporting nation.'"
Feeder clubs and a semi-closed shop make sense from a business perspective. Whether the majority of fans would agree, I doubt it. This is not the 1980s anymore. Leigh, Fev or whoever are not going to win the top flight "Championship" again unless they are bankrolled with millions of pounds. Sad maybe, but that's the reality of sport in 2013. |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 277 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Aug 2013 | 11 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Feb 2014 | Dec 2013 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
If we have sided with Leeds behind the RFL plan I fear we are no longer independent. Who represented us at Mondays meeting and if we did back the RFL plan why, it's like turkey's voting for Christmas.
I hope or expect this to be an incorrect assumption or family is more important than who pays the salary.
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Chairman | 1470 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 1970 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: t-r-i-n-i-t-y "Feeder clubs and a semi-closed shop make sense from a business perspective. Whether the majority of fans would agree, I doubt it. This is not the 1980s anymore. Leigh, Fev or whoever are not going to win the top flight "Championship" again unless they are bankrolled with millions of pounds. Sad maybe, but that's the reality of sport in 2013.'"
I wouldn't disagree with you on that, except to say that this has been the reality of rugby league or any other sport since the oldest fans can remember, and probably before that too.
There is, however, a principle that drives our sporting ethos, namely that you win the right to compete at the highest level on the field. We removed that with franchising, for reasons that seemed (at least to me) justifiable at the time. But I think they/I was wrong.
There is at least a workable compromise (see German football as an example) where licenses are granted to play in a certain league, based on certain criteria. P&R is, and remains, part of the game, however.
If we voted with Leeds in favour of the RFL proposals, then I'm glad. It may be turkeys voting for Christmas in our case, but on a matter of principle I think we did the right thing. (You have to ask yourself, in this situation, what's in it for Leeds to vote in favour too. They have nothing to gain from alienating themselves from the other SL clubs, and are highly unlikely to find themselves in a relegation battle any time in the near future.) |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 3829 |  |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2005 | 19 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Theboyem "It sounds as though we have sided with Leeds in FAVOUR of the RFL's proposals and are the only two clubs that have come out in support. There's a surprise.'"
Without knowing how we voted, why would we? It’d be like Turkeys voting for Christmas.
I don’t understand the Leeds stance either – very odd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
