Indeed they don't, a touch of the mixed metaphors

A strange scenario if true. Why didn't the RFL loan WT the money at more favourable terms rather than allowing money to haemorrhage from the game by allowing walker to act as intermediary?

might not of trusted the owner at the time

Do you know some people are never what they seem. They are able to build a false image of themselves which is quick to impress and can last years before people start to realise otherwise. Typical example is the football scam of Kaisor, well worth a read.

For instance you can give yourself a certain type name or job description which at first glance sounds grand and can open doors by people who are easily impressed and don't look to deep, Once this happens you can continue to add other bits to reinforce this perception and eventually build up an highly impressive profile.

Wakefield Civic Society,object.

Quote: Joe Banjo "Wakefield Civic Society,object.'" In 2008, concerned about proposals (now abandoned) to build a sports stadium in Thornes Park, we held a public meeting and called for volunteers to establish a new community group to work with the council and other stakeholders to improve and protect the three parks - Clarence Park, Homfield Park and Thornes Park. This led to the creation of The Friends of CHaT Parks, an independent group group run by volunteers who care about these parks. https://chatparks.org.uk/ but is happy to promote the athletics stadium https://chatparks.org.uk/topics/visitor-attractions/ well that's nice of them does it say what they are object to Kevin Trickett seems to be a name at the top running the website

Quote: Joe Banjo "Wakefield Civic Society,object.'" In 2008, concerned about proposals (now abandoned) to build a sports stadium in Thornes Park, we held a public meeting and called for volunteers to establish a new community group to work with the council and other stakeholders to improve and protect the three parks - Clarence Park, Homfield Park and Thornes Park. This led to the creation of The Friends of CHaT Parks, an independent group group run by volunteers who care about these parks. https://chatparks.org.uk/ but is happy to promote the athletics stadium https://chatparks.org.uk/topics/visitor-attractions/ well that's nice of them does it say what they are object to Kevin Trickett seems to be a name at the top running the website

I spoke to Kevin Trickett at a WCS exhibition on one of the Wakefield Artwalk evenings, seems a decent bloke. He showed nothing but disdain for Peter Box and Wakefield Council, referred to them as 'this bloody lot'.

How many members have WCS?

According to rlhttps://www.civicvoice.org.uk/societies/wakefield-civic-society/rl

Individual Members: 193
Life members: 19

Thanks ksc,that means another 200 hundred objections.

its a good that we have their support, I'd never heard of the group until now

Whilst I admire your optimism, I think you'll find it only counts as one objection.

maybe all the members of the WCS will object.

Anyone see Box's answer to Clr Ahmed's question regarding on going talks about the stadium? Could have wrote his answer on the back of a fag packet it was that laughably brief, and was even submitted to Box before hand by the sounds.
When pressed for more details Box comes back quite arrogantly then persists to put Clr Ahmed down with some unnecessary comments. In the very brief response he did say there were on going talks with Yorkcourt, owners of belle Vue (Manni) and 'other interested parties' but no mention specifically of the club....