Not cut for super league I don't think. Best of luck to him.

He hasn't developed enough physically for the straight forward type of game he plays (run hard, tackle hard) IMHO. If this area is addressed he could yet become a good super league standard player but is still short of it.

He probably needs to speak to the other Kyle who now plays for St. Helens who has worked on his size, strength and conditioning over the last few years to great effect and now is one of the best props in the game. Needs to bulk up another stone of muscle and move into the front row insufficient pace/skill out wide for second row.

Could this be the reason why our juniors don't develop like other teams?
As this thread seems to be about chucking him on the scrap heap at 20 or 21?
Amor was at Whitehaven, got bought by Leeds and still played at Whitehaven the following season.
Amor is now 26, will be 27 at the end of May, so cut Trout some slack, still got 2 or 3 years left before he gets slung on the scrap heap!

Yep you're right he can play for us in the championship next year. Amor was signed by Leeds at 22 Trout is 23 now.

He'd do a better job than Washbrook.

I'd do a better job mate.

We're Wakefield Wildcats and we don't know how to catch.
Washbrook should go play his level at Hunslet!!!

Think getting Gary Price back at 13 would do better than Washbrook.

Without a doubt. Although as you'd be classed as homegrown you wouldn't get picked.

I'd be sent out on loan, probably Eastmoor.

Didnt know you was on tag Al ¿

Thought Westgate was ur stomping ground

To be fair to Kyle Trout he has been told to bulk up to play prop (which he did), was then asked to slim down to play back row (which he did), just prior to been asked to bulk up again.
To say he has been messed about is an understatement. Basically, Agar thinks there is a good player there, but does'nt know what to do with him.