Surely then by this logic the government have to provide proof to the people of the UK that the NHS is on the brink of being overwhelmed by this virus as they keep claiming. All the government do is give diktat by showing a lack of supportive statistics to support most of their claims. I'm sorry but I will not accept a positive PCR test or a mathematical model as factual evidence. Interestingly when substantiated proof was recently requested in Manchester it was found the number of patients in hospital was lower than this time last year!

It was never intended as a dig at anyone specific. I lived and breathed this for 5 months on ICU, where the guidelines were constantly changed to suit What ever PPE was available at the time. I too am a sceptic of the use of masks, as a lot of research around the beginning of the year suggested it is actually very ineffective due to constant touching of the face ie repositioning with hands on face then touching whatever before and after, plus the added fact I believe the blue surgical masks actually have an effective period against surgical diathermy smoke of around 4 minutes, never mind against a virus. What I do agree with is that this whole year has had a catastrophic effect on people’s mental health, and if it means people feel more safe leaving their homes Wearing a mask in order to do what ever is important to them then so be it.

I get blamed, no, correction, it's a smear campaign plain and simple, for being a conspiracy theorist or spreading fake news then when I go to the
The s for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which is a national public health institute in the United States. It is a United States federal agency, under the Department of Health and Human Services, and is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.. whose main goal is to protect public health and safety through the control and prevention of disease, injury, and disability in the US and internationally.

I am now rubbished in favour of a few anecdotes when I myself have been rubbished for my anecdotes by being asked to back it up with scientific evidence . The difference being my anecdotes are of a positive nature yet you lot give only negative feedback even when faced with bona fide scientific evidence.

I did not say I agreed with it I asked for those who rubbish me to look at it and “pick the bones” out of it. Convince me it is wrong, explaine where I may be misreading something in there But no, you can't be bothered and ignore it in favour of “one of my pals” etc.

I respectfully ask you to look at a quite astonishing piece of evidence from the respected CDC in order for you to make up your own minds and still you are in denial preferring your anecdote to a scientific study and quite beyond belief you compare the CDC to the “sci fi fraternity”. Bizarre reasons,Chinese and 5G when I have mentioned non of that.
And now I am sick for going into the heart of a scientific study.

Non of you can even point, though I have asked many times, to back up your claims that I promote fake news or conspiracy theories or in the case of speed read the first line PopTart that I quote "liars"

Never have I come across such a bunch of hypocrites in my whole life.

Did anyone watch the heated argument on talkRadio between Dan Wooten and MP Chris Bryant for Rhondda in South Wales? MP Bryant was kicking off claiming that the ICU is currently 75% full compared to this time last year only being half that percentage. The average occupancy rate for intensive care in his area, The Royal Glamorgan Hospital, over the course of last year was 79.8%. https://statswales.gov.wales/Catalogue/ ... -specialty Does anyone know why he is likely lying? Or can you point out why my stats are wrong and Bryant is correct?

Did anyone watch the heated argument on talkRadio between Dan Wooten and MP Chris Bryant for Rhondda in South Wales? MP Bryant was kicking off claiming that the ICU is currently 75% full compared to this time last year only being half that percentage. The average occupancy rate for intensive care in his area, The Royal Glamorgan Hospital, over the course of last year was 79.8%. https://statswales.gov.wales/Catalogue/ ... -specialty Does anyone know why he is likely lying? Or can you point out why my stats are wrong and Bryant is correct?

If people are arguing that Covid-19 is not infectious, then can someone explain, in the simplest terms, why just about every country in the world has decided to impose restrictions that have devastated their economies and will do for a long time to come? It would only take a few to step out of line and say, "we're fine, it's not infectious, come and do business here, send your tourists, buy our currency" and they would become much more powerful.

As for the argument about smartphones, most technological advances have a flipside. The internet is one of the world's greatest inventions. It helps us so much in our daily lives, from having all the information you need at your fingertips to booking holidays and to the amount of streaming entertainment available. But it comes at a cost, because all the loons in the world have a voice and access to an audience, so of course some regulation is required. It has always been the same with all technological advances. The car was invented, so we had to invent speed limits to cut death rates.

Smartphones entertain and inform people. Companies want to monetise that entertainment. Someone invents electricity so someone works out how to make electronic billboards. Not everything is a conspiracy. Sometimes, it is just the checks and balances that make the world keep turning.

But if someone sees everything as some huge masterplan, they will interpret everything in that context.

What I see is people dying and becoming ill from a respiratory illness. Also, I see some people who have been in contact with those ill people also become ill. That is the very definition of infectious. It doesn't seem difficult to grasp.

Look through the thread, the subject has been covered extensively.

I did, and your premise seems to be flawed.

On the one hand, you argue that Covid isn't infectious. On the other, you say that Covid is a capitalist reset, designed for the rich countries to redesign capitalism.

Those two positions are incompatible, as if Covid is not infectious, then there can be no pandemic, so capitalism cannot be reset. It has to be infectious for the window of opportunity to open.

It could only be compatible if either:
a) it is infectious but is a deliberate plot by rich nations.
The problem with this theory is that you would think they would have tipped off the President of the USA and the British Prime Minister.
The Trump issue is particularly problematic, as he has been very dismissive of Covid, so it is in his interests to say he has never had it and never will.
b) it is not infectious but all the people are being misdiagnosed.
This doesn't work at all as an option.

The problem with theories about capitalist leaders engaging in conspiracies is that you are dealing with people who are ruthless and greedy, thus meaning that it would fail as it relies on everyone sticking together in a common cause, despite the greater hardships it might cause some of them, which is in fact the definition of socialism, the exact opposite of capitalism, and thus doomed to fail.

Put simply, what you see will depend on which lens to look through, and you can see anything if you want to see it enough.

Your argument here fails on so many levels because you are ascribing words and thoughts that I have not seen on here.

e.g.
“Some regulation is required” No argument there.

“Not everything is a conspiracy “ Who said it was https://angloamerica101.wordpress.com/2 ... an-beings/
https://ourgreaterdestiny.org/2020/10/a ... ars-cov-2/
https://drtomcowan.com/only-poisoned-mo ... FpbCI6ICJq

The power of the internet is huge and many are persuaded by such scandalous headline-grabbing stories. Not many will take the time to check the original source or the background of those promoting the lies. Interestingly, the wording seems to have been copy/pasted in many places.

The problem is this was picked up by pseudo-scientists with vested interest and then published on a number of 'blogs' with their own interpretation of what it said.
Can you tell me who Sally Fallon Morell is and what are her qualifications? I hope she's not just someone with dubious scientific claims about nutrition trying to sell her books.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weston_A. ... lon_Morell
Oh and a doctor: Dr. Tom Cowan (the irony just hurts sometimes)
https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/fact ... -1.5506595

Anyway, check out this thread on reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/com ... ney_cells/

So, is preventing the spread of this fake, and potentially dangerous, information censorship or are people being protected from such myths?