Irresponsible reporting
Wakefield and district's numbers in the reporting period have increased from 3 to 6 so 100% increase. York also quoted as a problem area as they have increased from 0 to 1. You have to ignore percentages and look at the numbers. Recent areas showing significant increases have also undertaken mass testing of specific groups and several have shown asymptomatic infection and been acted upon.

Are the numbers you are quoting pillar 1 or do they include the elusive and much larger pillar 2 numbers that the government appear to withhold.

Is that a fact or just speculation on your part, also will it stop the league restarting on August the 2nd.

If you go on reputation fact, but if you believe he never lies speculation.

Dont know if I've missed this but, cant find confirmation anywhere but, when is our first restart fixture and who are we playing and are there details on any other of our games ?

Quote: Scarlet Pimpernell "It could be that the ambition to get the players back could be scuppered by the government including Wakefield in the next wave of local lockdowns.'" ... because we've had four new cases over the past week? https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wakefi ... 0232%3famp The headline itself is misleading when you read the article. We seem to be on par with the rest of the UK.

Quote: Scarlet Pimpernell "It could be that the ambition to get the players back could be scuppered by the government including Wakefield in the next wave of local lockdowns.'" ... because we've had four new cases over the past week? https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wakefi ... 0232%3famp The headline itself is misleading when you read the article. We seem to be on par with the rest of the UK.

We were listed in the 36 areas for possible local lockdown according to Public Health England and Department for Health.