Although if Neil had played, the game would have unfolded differently, just because everything during a game affects the outcome, and we'll never know whether we would have won or lost. It's likely the kick would never have been taken at the end. For instance, wasn't it Don's kick off that sent the ball into the water that caught the Leeds players off-guard, which allowed us to score the try that needed converting? All ifs buts and maybe's, but what we do know is that if Neil had been playing, Don could have retired after that game, as he was going to do anyway, without that miss hanging round his neck for the rest of his life.

I’m to young to remember midweek games and fixture congestion. It’s never been more than one game a week other than Easter. Some of the older fans say that although they don’t want it back especially (cost as much as anything) it did create some unbelievably exciting weeks of RL.

Kind of puts the complaints about the Easter fixture into perspective. Yeah it’s a different game now but not that different. If a bunch of part timers can manage three games in a week (just) then surely the pros can manage it for one week a year. Probably controversial on my part but for me Easter is the best week of the first half of the season, purely because it’s so unpredictable. You can go in well off the pace and come out front runners if things go your way. Slightly OT but there is a point.

Neil did say he would have kicked the goal in front of the post . But then said he might have not kicked the other goals that Don kicked . That was the game where Leeds got the tag lucky Leeds