Sorry,but youve just highlighted yourself why its silly to compare the two.
"Big,well known and financially strong" add into that well established,everything Spirit of 1873 isnt.

I havent suggested anyone is going bust/having financial troubles.

Any new start business attracting this amount of adverse info is doing itself no favours at all.
The public record is what every single financial institution will use to establish the strength of the business.

No surprise - best I can say is you had to be there to know how it really was whilst fully accepting not everybody could be.

Wow and another one!!!!!

I wonder what excuses will be trotted out this time.......

21/02/2013 NORTHAMPTON CCBC £4,877 Judgement 3XJ80257

From a catering firm. The owner really has a cheek was caught with sticky fingers in too many wakey pies. I wouldn't have paid the little scrote up either after what he did

Did he put horsemeat in the pies???

It's not what he was putting in anything that was the issue!

Whatever he put in he took more out!

Thought it was a company owed money by Northampton RLFC who went under and because we were involved with them at the time they are trying to claim it off us. Heard we've been advised not to pay it as we don't owe it and the RFL are one of the parties that advised us. Nothing to see the future is good for our great club.

Too true, he can whistle.

So from the past few posts it is a case of won't pay.

I wonder if the club are considering any legal action against this person who is seemingly dragging their name through the mud with, if I've understood correctly, unreasonable claims.

that's like Mr Probiz

Ok, whether or not it's a case of can't pay or won't pay, when CCJ's are first issued, that's the claim not the judgement, you are given a set period of time to respond and if wanted to counter claim, (from memory 28days), if you do not reply, judgement is issued by default whether at fault or not. So, something is seriously amiss at the club, claims are NOT sent to registered offices, they are send to the buisness address, so the club saying it's because we changed registered office is, to put it bluntly, . I issue these things regularly as part of my job, in the last 2 years i have issued approx 50 claims, only 2 have ever gone to judgement by default.

make your own minds up........

Yeah probably so.

Maybe a certain poster should stop and think before using things like this as a petty excuse to have a go at this club. But thats probably not going to happen.

Indeed. The most embarrassing thing about this thread is that it was started at all!!