Thats not how a forum works bud, you post an opinion - others challenge it. Just sulking and not offering anything in return to back your opinion when challenged up makes you look a bit daft and your argument look a bit paper thin.

I am not sulking just merely asking the question of who would want to coach wakey at the moment.JD could cut his teeth in nl with us,jowitt is doing fairly well at dewsbury,after a rocky start,and is now doing quite well.As you say it is my opinion.

Because Mariano simply isn't up to it yet from what i have seen, unlike Paul Johnson who i think has been a great spot.

re signing Utility players, the issue any coach would have at Wakefield is who wants to come here and also managing the quota, it's been a two horse race re the franchise for some time and currently it's a one horse one.

Most of the players signed in the off season if not all are on 1 year deals, so I am sure that there would have been some props with similar backgrounds as the utility backs he has signed that would have been willing to play for a year with us to prove they could hack SL with the hope of getting a better deal from someone else when we get the boot.

So why bother signing him?

Why bother putting him in the 19 man squad?

One would presume/hope JK looked at footage of the player and deemed him to be "up to it" before signing him.

Re Mariano, because there is nobody better in our current squad, which is sad but true....quite clearly JK wants to sign a prop but cannot and has not been able to for sometime..

Would you prefer him not to name a full 19?

It's easy to blame.....

I'm not saying JK is a genius or anything like that, but stating the obvious in that he has not been given a fair go this year at getting a team on the pitch that is going to compete with most SL teams...

Lets give the guy a break, all this destructive talk about JK and the new owners on another thread gets the club nowhere

It's easy to blame.....

I'm not saying JK is a genius or anything like that, but stating the obvious in that he has not been given a fair go this year at getting a team on the pitch that is going to compete with most SL teams...

Lets give the guy a break, all this destructive talk about JK and the new owners on another thread gets the club nowhere'"

What is the contract situation with the players we've brought in? Is Johnson and Mariano on our books or on loan. And and Vievers and Howarth on loan from wigan?

Ladies and gentlemen we have a winner. If Andy Kelly would take the job then I am firmly in the Kear out brigade. Should have been given the chance to do it his way the first time around.

They're all signed permanently as far as i'm aware, not that makes any differance should the club lose their license.

I'll go with that,

Always thought he got a raw deal last time.

+1, although I think Clan may have to declare a slight conflict of interest!

id have him back at least it was entertaining when he was here, not the dross were getting now.

We should never have got rid of Kelly and also we should never have got rid of Shane McNally. When McNally was in charge we were one of if not the most exciting team in the league to watch in terms of style of play, he had a bad start to a season and we got rid of him and replaced him with Tony Smith and look what happened there. Getting rid of McNally in my opinion was one of the worst decisions of the Richardson era.