Just been on look north, that piece makes the area sounds fantastic.... pity the reality and the rest of the land isnt the same! very one sided article it seemed to me!

Balanced feature my !

Not happy about that at all - a small part of the development!!!

I see Look North have nailed their colours to the mast then! I can only think that if this had been the Rhinos they would have approached it from a completely different angle and actually gone out of their way to show the benefits of the development rather then predominantly focusing on the opposition’s viewpoint.

just been on look north for a couple of mins and didn't put over a balanced point of view,
tv media has a greater effect as it becomes left on your mind with images of looking over a scenery with comments "you can't buy a view like that"

that snippet on the tv didn't do us any favours and made it look like it was all about WTW and not the community in general,

don't you just hate media

I was filmed for 2 or 3 minutes - that's longer than the feature itself, but the only bit they played was about Trin - none of the Community stuff I gave them!

I'm not paranoid or one for conspiracy theories, and usually shoot them down, but the question has to be asked then as to what is going on behind-the-scenes to discredit this scheme so much, and why are two seperate media outlets in the Wakefield Express - and a couple of pictures of the Wildcat Dolls and the story on the silly baby name won't change my mind on the rag - and the supposedly impartial BBC Leeds, with both Radio Leeds and Look North being based in the same building of course, have/are producing pieces which are not balanced.

Quote: Khlav Kalash "It's pretty disgusting for a supposed impartial broadcaster to practically use it's influence as a rallying cry for opposition comments to be sent in. Complaints department for the Bbc and Ofcom anyone?!'" that was on my mind www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/handle.shtml

Quote: Khlav Kalash "It's pretty disgusting for a supposed impartial broadcaster to practically use it's influence as a rallying cry for opposition comments to be sent in. Complaints department for the Bbc and Ofcom anyone?!'" that was on my mind www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/handle.shtml

short and to the point but it was easy to put through, I recommend that you all follow suit as for all the hard work done we still have keep pushing the cause

here's what I sent

I am totally disgusted at the unbalanced way this came over, TV media has a right to allow both sides of an argument to be heard I know for a fact that Phil Townsend interview was cut so short that it hardly put over that

1, this stadium to be built isn't just for the use of Wakefield Trinity Wildcats, it is a community stadium open to many uses,

2, much needed employment to an area that has suffered great loss in the mining community,

3, that the site in which the development is to done was a mine that closed many years ago, it is a known fly tipping eye sore.

4, that roads will be developed to redirect to make it pleasing to locals,

while I know you have to cut to allow it to fit to your programs you have damaged the amount of good work that has been done in two or three minutes, there was nothing about the amount of support for the project where over 15,000 signatures of approval towards it was mentioned, and many from that local area,

why was there not a report from the developers that intend to do the project ? its amazing how you can over look this

What a completely one sided piece on the new stadium/industrial development. Thought Harry looked smug when he introduced the piece. They managed to find just about the only decent view from what is a piece of derelict land. It was blatantly obvious that we did not get a balanced point of view.

I have just voiced my feelings to them.

They have not done any homework on this story and can't be bothered with any facts unless its anti anything Wakefield, now if it was a Leeds story it would have been different.