Deadwood you ask. Amnesty International are certainly concerned about some of the shenanigans going on at the peak of the crisisUK

"[iKey failings included decisions to discharge thousands of untested hospital patients into care homes and imposition of blanket DNARs

Between 2 March and 12 June this year 28,186 “excess deaths” were recorded in care homes in England, with over 18,500 care home residents confirmed to have died with COVID-19 during this period.

Most shockingly, on 17 March, four days after the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a global pandemic, the Government ordered the discharge of 25,000 patients from hospitals into care homes, including those infected or possibly infected with COVID-19.

On 2 April, the same day that the WHO confirmed the existence of pre-symptomatic cases of COVID-19, the Government reiterated its guidance for hospital discharge that ‘Negative tests are not required prior to transfers / admissions into the care home’.

Several care home managers told Amnesty that they had no COVID-19 in their homes until after they received patients discharged from hospital.

These and other decisions taken by the Government led to violations of human rights of older people in care homes during the pandemic - notably their right to life, their right to health and their right to non-discrimination.

Amnesty received multiple reports of care home residents’ right to NHS services - including access to general medical services and hospital admission - being denied during the pandemic. Care home staff and relatives told Amnesty how sending residents to hospital was discouraged or outright refused.

A series of “shockingly irresponsible” Government decisions put tens of thousands of older people’s lives at risk and led to multiple violations of care home residents’ human rights, said Amnesty International today, following an investigation by the human rights group’s Crisis Response team."[/i

Shall we discredit Amnesty International as conspiracy theorists too?

Full article found here:

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/ ... -pandemic/

These vulnerable elderly people warranted and deserved our protection from day one, obviously our benevolent experts disagreed.

Deadwood you ask. Amnesty International are certainly concerned about some of the shenanigans going on at the peak of the crisisUK

"[iKey failings included decisions to discharge thousands of untested hospital patients into care homes and imposition of blanket DNARs

Between 2 March and 12 June this year 28,186 “excess deaths” were recorded in care homes in England, with over 18,500 care home residents confirmed to have died with COVID-19 during this period.

Most shockingly, on 17 March, four days after the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a global pandemic, the Government ordered the discharge of 25,000 patients from hospitals into care homes, including those infected or possibly infected with COVID-19.

On 2 April, the same day that the WHO confirmed the existence of pre-symptomatic cases of COVID-19, the Government reiterated its guidance for hospital discharge that ‘Negative tests are not required prior to transfers / admissions into the care home’.

Several care home managers told Amnesty that they had no COVID-19 in their homes until after they received patients discharged from hospital.

These and other decisions taken by the Government led to violations of human rights of older people in care homes during the pandemic - notably their right to life, their right to health and their right to non-discrimination.

Amnesty received multiple reports of care home residents’ right to NHS services - including access to general medical services and hospital admission - being denied during the pandemic. Care home staff and relatives told Amnesty how sending residents to hospital was discouraged or outright refused.

A series of “shockingly irresponsible” Government decisions put tens of thousands of older people’s lives at risk and led to multiple violations of care home residents’ human rights, said Amnesty International today, following an investigation by the human rights group’s Crisis Response team."[/i

Shall we discredit Amnesty International as conspiracy theorists too?

Full article found here:

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/ ... -pandemic/

These vulnerable elderly people warranted and deserved our protection from day one, obviously our benevolent experts disagreed.

I prefer the term epidemic rather than pandemic.

No, I've never denied the existence of the virus, go back and search through all my posts on this site. I've always accepted based on the data that it's rate of transmission is greater than other respiratory virus with it being new and in comparison to a severe flu outbreak (IFR - 0.1%) it is about twice as deadly (IFR - 0.2%). By the middle of next year many credible doctors and scientists believe we will see it improved to a 99.9% survival rate (reason - natural immunity and better treatments) and eventually further down the line become classified as nothing more than a standard coronavirus. Everyone that checked the data from the beginning of January with a half a brain cell could conclude the vulnerable and highly aged were in the main the only demographic that would be severely affected by this virus. And you wonder why we've had over 40,000 deaths in the UK What I've questioned on here is the disproportionate response from governments, so called experts and mainstream media. Due to the continued list of so called "mistakes" it makes me conclude this is more about power, money, control and nothing to do with public health.

Here's another "mistake" I cam across the other day that was made in the past, not once but TWICE!

SARS escaped Beijing lab twice

https://www.the-scientist.com/news-anal ... wice-50137

I prefer the term epidemic rather than pandemic.

No, I've never denied the existence of the virus, go back and search through all my posts on this site. I've always accepted based on the data that it's rate of transmission is greater than other respiratory virus with it being new and in comparison to a severe flu outbreak (IFR - 0.1%) it is about twice as deadly (IFR - 0.2%). By the middle of next year many credible doctors and scientists believe we will see it improved to a 99.9% survival rate (reason - natural immunity and better treatments) and eventually further down the line become classified as nothing more than a standard coronavirus. Everyone that checked the data from the beginning of January with a half a brain cell could conclude the vulnerable and highly aged were in the main the only demographic that would be severely affected by this virus. And you wonder why we've had over 40,000 deaths in the UK What I've questioned on here is the disproportionate response from governments, so called experts and mainstream media. Due to the continued list of so called "mistakes" it makes me conclude this is more about power, money, control and nothing to do with public health.

Here's another "mistake" I cam across the other day that was made in the past, not once but TWICE!

SARS escaped Beijing lab twice

https://www.the-scientist.com/news-anal ... wice-50137

Remember this.....

"The critical moment in recent weeks can be traced back to 21 September, when Sir Patrick Vallance, the UK's chief scientific adviser and Prof Chris Whitty, the UK's chief medical adviser, warned of the need for immediate action.
In a televised briefing, Sir Patrick warned cases [icould [/ireach 50,000 a day by mid-October if they doubled every seven days, as had happened in recent weeks."

Funny that, despite the doom of the two experts, they "could"
But they haven't reached 20,000.....

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54546867

Details are in the above article.

Remember this.....

"The critical moment in recent weeks can be traced back to 21 September, when Sir Patrick Vallance, the UK's chief scientific adviser and Prof Chris Whitty, the UK's chief medical adviser, warned of the need for immediate action.
In a televised briefing, Sir Patrick warned cases [icould [/ireach 50,000 a day by mid-October if they doubled every seven days, as had happened in recent weeks."

Funny that, despite the doom of the two experts, they "could"
But they haven't reached 20,000.....

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54546867

Details are in the above article.