You miss the point.

It's nothing to do with Ted or AG it's to do with the general state of the club and the ground IMO. BV has been improved significantly over the past 20 years starting with the floodlights, boxes, new toilet blocks and new barriers. All this cost it just happens that the latest and most visible was the roof.

The sad fact is that despite AG's best efforts I fear we still don't generate enough cash to run a SL club at a level to compete. We are not alone just look at Salford and even Bradford.

I assume you are young. Thus a bit of history. After the Hillsborough disaster a lot of clubs were clobbered by new ground rules (by law). BV was hit harder than most and money earmarked for a new stand was continually diluted to meet these new criteria, the floodlights being an expensive one along with the underpinning of the kop.

I feel very sorry for anyone who takes on WTRLFC the BV version unless of course they are midas rich which would be nice.

I wouldn't argue that BV is a millstone that will drag down whomever owns the club, so long as it is based there; NM can't happen soon enough.

I disagree, to use carphone warehouse as an example is not silly at all, it fully supports my point. A big, well known and financially strong company has CCJ's against them. Do you think any less of CPW or think they will go bust? Do you think they have financial troubles? I suspect you don't. So to say it is a silly example is missing my point completely.

CPW lost their CCJ against me. CPW lost. The court ruled in my favour. If the court ruled against Wakefield Trinity does that mean the situation is vastly different?

Only the club know the true ins and outs of this CCJ, we can just see the public record.

I think, as I said before, people should calm down unless they know the facts.

Sorry,but youve just highlighted yourself why its silly to compare the two.
"Big,well known and financially strong" add into that well established,everything Spirit of 1873 isnt.

I havent suggested anyone is going bust/having financial troubles.

Any new start business attracting this amount of adverse info is doing itself no favours at all.
The public record is what every single financial institution will use to establish the strength of the business.

No surprise - best I can say is you had to be there to know how it really was whilst fully accepting not everybody could be.

Wow and another one!!!!!

I wonder what excuses will be trotted out this time.......

21/02/2013 NORTHAMPTON CCBC £4,877 Judgement 3XJ80257

From a catering firm. The owner really has a cheek was caught with sticky fingers in too many wakey pies. I wouldn't have paid the little scrote up either after what he did

Did he put horsemeat in the pies???

It's not what he was putting in anything that was the issue!

Whatever he put in he took more out!

Thought it was a company owed money by Northampton RLFC who went under and because we were involved with them at the time they are trying to claim it off us. Heard we've been advised not to pay it as we don't owe it and the RFL are one of the parties that advised us. Nothing to see the future is good for our great club.

Too true, he can whistle.

So from the past few posts it is a case of won't pay.

I wonder if the club are considering any legal action against this person who is seemingly dragging their name through the mud with, if I've understood correctly, unreasonable claims.

that's like Mr Probiz