that is ridiculous to punish kids who have done nothing wrong,its the clubs that should get punished not players.

Couldn't agree more - I wonder if they'd do this in a " proper" season, not this interim one ? Just isn't right in my eyes .

think you all have this wrong its the kids fault for not paying the fines and I think they have been lenient on them,

how dare their spend their money on pop and sweets they should get their priorities right and tip the money over when asked

they have turned criggs game into a 18-0 looking at points for/ag win



whatever happened. grown men and women at whatever level are responsible , not the children even if that goes as far as an eligible player who is not registerd to play that responsibility lies with adults. not the kids.

Quote muttley cat="muttley cat"they have turned criggs game into a 18-0 looking at points for/ag win whatever happened. grown men and women at whatever level are responsible , not the children even if that goes as far as an eligible player who is not registerd to play that responsibility lies with adults. not the kids.'" yep 18-0 which we know is game being given to oppression result, not that crigg needed it www.yorkshirejuniorsarl.co.uk/results?c=56 i struggle to see how they can deduct for fines and then give points to others , normally a point deduction for fines issues is just that points deducted with no other team benefiting. taken the gloss of a great season IMHO.

Quote muttley cat="muttley cat"they have turned criggs game into a 18-0 looking at points for/ag win whatever happened. grown men and women at whatever level are responsible , not the children even if that goes as far as an eligible player who is not registerd to play that responsibility lies with adults. not the kids.'" yep 18-0 which we know is game being given to oppression result, not that crigg needed it www.yorkshirejuniorsarl.co.uk/results?c=56 i struggle to see how they can deduct for fines and then give points to others , normally a point deduction for fines issues is just that points deducted with no other team benefiting. taken the gloss of a great season IMHO.

Quote muttley cat="muttley cat"yep 18-0 which we know is game being given to oppression result, not that crigg needed it www.yorkshirejuniorsarl.co.uk/results?c=56 i struggle to see how they can deduct for fines and then give points to others , normally a point deduction for fines issues is just that points deducted with no other team benefiting. taken the gloss of a great season IMHO.'" its complete madness that eastmoor and stanningley have been awarded points because another side failed to pay a fine,im really glad its not a proper league has id be seething has we would have lost ground on a side that didnt deserve two points. i just dont see the logic neither do i see how it hurts them given there is no league trophy.

Quote muttley cat="muttley cat"yep 18-0 which we know is game being given to oppression result, not that crigg needed it www.yorkshirejuniorsarl.co.uk/results?c=56 i struggle to see how they can deduct for fines and then give points to others , normally a point deduction for fines issues is just that points deducted with no other team benefiting. taken the gloss of a great season IMHO.'" its complete madness that eastmoor and stanningley have been awarded points because another side failed to pay a fine,im really glad its not a proper league has id be seething has we would have lost ground on a side that didnt deserve two points. i just dont see the logic neither do i see how it hurts them given there is no league trophy.

bizarre beyond belief , and i agree [uIF[/u its fines . one thing for sure is that if it is instead of fines they have come out of it pretty well . 2 teams get 2 points cas p drop a place in league that means not a lot (tell that to the boys

).

same as happened to Shaw cross . stanley seem convinced off promotion now but again its the kids who suffer.

one thing for sure with a bulging message box the truth is almost definitely out there

which kids are those then? even without the deduction points are 14 each and stanley have a game this weekend!

here you go , 2 wins have been taken off shaw cross .

i know the reason (allegory

behind that but refuse to comment as cross dont have a voice on here it would seem. and yep they would of been closer. just unfair on kids really and im sure that both
stanley and crigg would of finished top of groups respectively had the same games been played.

its like a bitter sweet victory the joy they can take is both crigg and rangers beat lane and cross.

all shaw cross junior teams lost 4 points because a £15 fine hadn't been paid, their coach was a bit cheesed off to say the least. just like to say that they play some excellent rugby chucking the ball at pace from wing to wing and if 2 teams go up they are very deserving of 1 of the places. what time is the crigg under 12 game at on sunday?

no game as yet meant to be playing lock lane but they in cup competition with panthers .needed warm up for week after in barla final

If it is related to non-payment of fines then the punsihment seems at odds with the constitution.


''35.4 All fines must be paid by the last day of the following month from the date of the fixture or discipline meeting otherwise it will automatically double and ALL fixtures for that Member Club shall be suspended and awarded to the opposing teams with a score of 18 - 0 against until paid.''

Nothing about retrospectively changing the result of a previously played match.

Chile