that's suprised me I have to say .

We beat Stanningley 26-16 . Raced into an early 20-0 lead and looked really good in the first half , scored again early in the second and then switched off !
But with the lock lane points deduction we're now top ( don't know what's happened there - certainly ain't fair on the players )!
Hopefully arrange a game next week , & then the final the week after

shame we can not play the stanley match but they are busy .


can not believe that what ever happen was bad enough to punish the lock lane players , very unfair and unjust . some folk must O D on horlicks just to get 40 winks.

as for east leeds and cas . east leeds can do that to you and make every team look poor when east leeds do what they do best. still scratching my head as to what went wrong that day although i think the 2 mile detour was planned

Horrid bitter windy conditions didn't stop the Stanley Ranger U14s take control from the start,
playing down hill in the first half they racked up a 26-0 lead that wasn't to be threatened, Dewsbury Moor never gave in and manged two tries but the final score ended 42-10

Next week we entertain our fellow division team Dudley Hill in the preliminary round of the Barla National cup which will be a nice warm up for the Barla County cup the week after that

wtf has gone off with lock lane for them to have the wins against stanningley and eastmoor taken away from them and the league points be given to those two sides.

surely it cannot have anything to do with last week has that would have no bearing on the stanningley and eastmoor games,i was at the eastmoor game and nobody played who shouldnt have done.

playing a illegible player?

Non payment of fines apparently - shaw cross have had the same too !
Even seems to be all age groups (!)
Worlds gone mad

that is ridiculous to punish kids who have done nothing wrong,its the clubs that should get punished not players.

Couldn't agree more - I wonder if they'd do this in a " proper" season, not this interim one ? Just isn't right in my eyes .

think you all have this wrong its the kids fault for not paying the fines and I think they have been lenient on them,

how dare their spend their money on pop and sweets they should get their priorities right and tip the money over when asked

they have turned criggs game into a 18-0 looking at points for/ag win



whatever happened. grown men and women at whatever level are responsible , not the children even if that goes as far as an eligible player who is not registerd to play that responsibility lies with adults. not the kids.

Quote muttley cat="muttley cat"they have turned criggs game into a 18-0 looking at points for/ag win whatever happened. grown men and women at whatever level are responsible , not the children even if that goes as far as an eligible player who is not registerd to play that responsibility lies with adults. not the kids.'" yep 18-0 which we know is game being given to oppression result, not that crigg needed it www.yorkshirejuniorsarl.co.uk/results?c=56 i struggle to see how they can deduct for fines and then give points to others , normally a point deduction for fines issues is just that points deducted with no other team benefiting. taken the gloss of a great season IMHO.

Quote muttley cat="muttley cat"they have turned criggs game into a 18-0 looking at points for/ag win whatever happened. grown men and women at whatever level are responsible , not the children even if that goes as far as an eligible player who is not registerd to play that responsibility lies with adults. not the kids.'" yep 18-0 which we know is game being given to oppression result, not that crigg needed it www.yorkshirejuniorsarl.co.uk/results?c=56 i struggle to see how they can deduct for fines and then give points to others , normally a point deduction for fines issues is just that points deducted with no other team benefiting. taken the gloss of a great season IMHO.

Quote muttley cat="muttley cat"yep 18-0 which we know is game being given to oppression result, not that crigg needed it www.yorkshirejuniorsarl.co.uk/results?c=56 i struggle to see how they can deduct for fines and then give points to others , normally a point deduction for fines issues is just that points deducted with no other team benefiting. taken the gloss of a great season IMHO.'" its complete madness that eastmoor and stanningley have been awarded points because another side failed to pay a fine,im really glad its not a proper league has id be seething has we would have lost ground on a side that didnt deserve two points. i just dont see the logic neither do i see how it hurts them given there is no league trophy.

Quote muttley cat="muttley cat"yep 18-0 which we know is game being given to oppression result, not that crigg needed it www.yorkshirejuniorsarl.co.uk/results?c=56 i struggle to see how they can deduct for fines and then give points to others , normally a point deduction for fines issues is just that points deducted with no other team benefiting. taken the gloss of a great season IMHO.'" its complete madness that eastmoor and stanningley have been awarded points because another side failed to pay a fine,im really glad its not a proper league has id be seething has we would have lost ground on a side that didnt deserve two points. i just dont see the logic neither do i see how it hurts them given there is no league trophy.