I have quite a wide circle of mates who are Waky fans and we all have realised what is happening in the big picture here and at the risk of upsetting SP we all back MC to the hilt. The council might have thought they were being clever and winning a propaganda war with an announcement laying the blame for failure at Wakefield Trinity's door (Re Belle Vue) but it was the final clincher and the penny finally dropped for us all that we were never going to get anything from this present lot.

As am I and I also don't blindly except what the Club says, even though I'd take MC's word over some developer or WMDC, just down to experience.
What I can do on this issue though to get the facts, is go back to WMDC's planning portal when all this started and read for myself what was promsied, for what reasons & how it was all gong to happen. Plus how Yorkcout got all that land taken out of greenbelt down to a S106 agreement. Which like I said to your previous point, was a lot to do with the 15000 signatures & the backing of the Community as a whole, as well as the need of better Community Sports facilities and creating jobs. Which WMDC were supposedly 100% behind back then. It is there where I have issue with what you say.

You try to paint a picture of this being all abour just Trinity, when factually that's wrong. You constantly talk about the ratepayer but yet fail to see it's them that's been shafted in this, Trinity supporter or not. Even if you're trying to play devils advocate as a Trinity fan about this issue, it doesn't come across that way at all to me. In fact if you're a Wakefield ratepayer, how don't you feel completely let down by all this?

You also say this forum is 'now the domain of a small group of like minded people who struggle with dissension.' No you're wrong, on the issue of what has happened at Newmarket, I think you'll find most people certainly agree that we've been shafted by several people , not just WMDC. But as far as topics such as the team, players we've got, new signings & how well we've played etc, it certainly isn't. We have a wide and varied discussion about those topics, but I suppose that doesn't suit your agenda/opinion.

This quote from February 2014 would suggest otherwise - can't be d to look for any more details but your statement above is clearly wrong.



You joined February 2014, Agar left in June 2014

HTH

You have either forgotten or was oblivious to the fact that before Scarlet Pimpernel reinvented himself he used to post as Agent13, well inside Agar's tenure.

A bit O/T but who was Rhubarb, was this another of Scarlett's posting names.

So you think that only one person can have an opinion that is contrary to you how quaint. I think you will find that they will have been hounded off the site rather than being reborn under a new name but if you want to believe it and it makes you all feel more secure go for it.

Nah - he didn't have agendas as such, he was a twillock to everyone!

So, who are all the poor posters who have been 'hounded' off the forum?
You sneer at others making claims then make bizarre claims of your own with no substance
whatsoever.

You really don't deserve all this attention you are getting TBF, you so obviously have your own private
agenda against MC and are using this forum as a platform to voice it.

Pretty sad really.

Scarlet Pimpernell is James Elston, and I claim my free double glazing and copy of Nuts magazine.

Or his girlfriend - she had a grudge if I recall.

I’m afraid he isn’t Bren.

Roonaldo6, you still out there?

Is he SRW, or Peter Box even

Or Ted?

"Harrogate" Ted?