I raise a few questions which of course none of you answer and therefore opt to the standard fall back position. I am definitely not thick nor am I unbelievably gullible, I will let you work out which one best suits you.

Perhaps you aren't on the email list regarding the answers/information. I'd ask to be put on the list, they don't want our 'confidential' info. putting on here - them o'er common may use it as ammunition.

No Richard actually! I made it as far as the A Team because Andrew Fletcher was in my way and then when he went walkabout David Jones managed to sneak in somehow? Steve is my brother.

Where would the logic in this statement be?
Get shut of players to sign others on the same or more money?
Tim Smiths contract was extended and upgraded twice in the space of a couple of months.
Paul Aitons contract was extended.
This is possibly the reason Trin got a fee for these two.
Justin Poore may have been on a sizeable contract and with one year left, Trin were happy just to get his wages off the books.
Amor one year left on contract, but Saints made the decision to buy him.
So to suggest that the club will start offering daft contracts to players to get them to sign, i think we have already been there not long ago.
Are you that bitter, that you want the current board to fail like the previous one, that you seem to favour?
MC was part of the previous board and maybe responsible partly for what has happened to the club now.
But instead of walking away, he has put his hand up, put his tin hat on and gone into no mans land.

What I am saying is that he answered the few questions he did with generalisations. We do not know how our squads salaries compare to other clubs, but we do know that we did not spend to the full cap. We are offloading the likes of Aiton and Poore who are so called high earners at WT however take Moore who was at Leeds we have not signed him could this be because his salary matches or is near to our so called high earners.
You should read my replies more carefully it would save you a lot of typing.
I do believe the current board are out of their depth however, they do not own the club it is still AG. If MC is looking to buy him out where is he going to get that money from if we cannot recoup enough to pay off the original black hole.

Why would MC bother with buying Glover out, unless it was a nominal fee? AG got us into this mess, if it all goes belly up let him lose his investment. If Carter were to blow his brass on buying his shares at a 'normal' price i'd have to question his sanity.

If glover & elston had any decency they'd sell all their shares to the supporters trust for a quid.

You are right, i should read your replies more carefully but i get so far and have suicidal thoughts and have to go for a lie down.
Good job we didn't spend to the full cap.
Why would MC want to buy AG out? Maybe later down the line, but not now.
The problem with clearing the shortfall, is that no company probably feels safe investing in Wake and that is making it twice as hard to reduce it.
Leading to, if 3000 season ticket holders weren't forthcoming, players get sold.
Why sign Moore now, better to sign him further down the line or not at all if a better player crops up.

It was stated when he was first appointed that his intention was to buy out AG. I did not say it but the messiah did.

He's not the messiah, he's a naughty little boy

He must know enough not to spend money on something he doesn't have to at the moment.
AG may still own the club but can't see him having much input.
Think he maybe more of a 'silent' owner.
And he's not the messiah, he's a very naughty boy.(According to you). Couldn't stop myself!!


Bugger, beaten to the punch!

I stopped reading after that part.

Fair point!