|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 10926 | London Skolars |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2021 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote bigalf="bigalf"If this proposal goes ahead will York Court still be happy to fund a Stadium when they are only getting land to develop 34% (Square Footage) of the original development?'"
And what gives you the impression that a) they will only develop 34% of the total or b) that they can't do the deal to build it? You clearly think you have inside information!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 12549 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Quote TRB="TRB"And what gives you the impression that a) they will only develop 34% of the total or b) that they can't do the deal to build it? You clearly think you have inside information!'"
... or is praying like hell we dont get the Stadium!

|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 48326 | Castleford Tigers |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2023 | Oct 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote TRB="TRB" You clearly think you have inside information!'"
TBF, that seems to be true of every poster on every one of these threads on both boards … 
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1347 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2022 | May 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote TRB="TRB"And what gives you the impression that a) they will only develop 34% of the total or b) that they can't do the deal to build it? You clearly think you have inside information!'"
The LDP plan shows an area which only covers Units 1a, 1b, 3 and 7 shown on the submitted plans aprox 681,000 sq ft out of a total of 1,974,000 sq ft
I can look at a plan and compare it with another!
By the way I hope we both get our stadiums !!!
www.wakefield.gov.uk/Planning/Sp ... foMode=xml
|
|
Quote TRB="TRB"And what gives you the impression that a) they will only develop 34% of the total or b) that they can't do the deal to build it? You clearly think you have inside information!'"
The LDP plan shows an area which only covers Units 1a, 1b, 3 and 7 shown on the submitted plans aprox 681,000 sq ft out of a total of 1,974,000 sq ft
I can look at a plan and compare it with another!
By the way I hope we both get our stadiums !!!
www.wakefield.gov.uk/Planning/Sp ... foMode=xml
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 21776 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| I wonder, hypothetically, whether the developers have worked out the lower level for the development and entered bigger plans so that they can be seen to be cutting back to meet public and council opinion.
The smaller initial development doesn't mean they can't do the stadium. Doesn't have to be an either/or.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4259 | Rochdale Hornets |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2020 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote bigalf="bigalf"If this proposal goes ahead will York Court still be happy to fund a Stadium when they are only getting land to develop 34% (Square Footage) of the original development?'"
bigalf - Don't link the exact area shown in the LDF, which is just the old Newmarket Colliery site area which is not land currently in or reclaimed for agricultural use, to mean that York Court will change their planning application or only get that area to develop in the granting of outline planning permission.
The LDF is one thing and the planning application another entirely!
The LDF is proposing that a large proportion of the land which is also currently (and coincidently) contained within York Court & the Stadium trust's current application be re-designated an employment area for type B8 development. This effectively will potential remove any issues now (or in the future) in terms of the development of this area of land. The proposed ground development being entirely outside of this area is a good thing as well, as in actual fact getting permission to develop something else in an area that has been specifically designated for a certain type of use, is actually harder than getting permission on an area not strictly designated, even in Green Belt! York Court are also currently asking to develop units & offices outside of this area and therefore they will have to (and I am sure will) present a commercial case for the need and requirement to do so, including land ownership boundaries, which the planning policy team (who are different people to the planning officers BTW) at WMDC people have no knowledge of when putting these things together. The planning officers and committee will have to take all of this into consideration if and when it grants permission but understanding that the proposal does use all of the land proposed to be re-designated. Also, WMDC HAS to find and grant permission for 95ha of B8 development land on the M62 corridor and the full York Court area (excluding the stadium) is still somewhere short of even doing that!
As TRB had said, this is really good news, and while we knew this might happen and the requirement for WMDC to allow to be developed an additional 95ha was known, it has happened! 
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1347 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2022 | May 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote Inflatable_Armadillo="Inflatable_Armadillo"bigalf - Don't link the exact area shown in the LDF, which is just the old Newmarket Colliery site area which is not land currently in or reclaimed for agricultural use, to mean that York Court will change their planning application or only get that area to develop in the granting of outline planning permission.
The LDF is one thing and the planning application another entirely!
The LDF is proposing that a large proportion of the land which is also currently (and coincidently) contained within York Court & the Stadium trust's current application be re-designated an employment area for type B8 development. This effectively will potential remove any issues now (or in the future) in terms of the development of this area of land. The proposed ground development being entirely outside of this area is a good thing as well, as in actual fact getting permission to develop something else in an area that has been specifically designated for a certain type of use, is actually harder than getting permission on an area not strictly designated, even in Green Belt! York Court are also currently asking to develop units & offices outside of this area and therefore they will have to (and I am sure will) present a commercial case for the need and requirement to do so, including land ownership boundaries, which the planning policy team (who are different people to the planning officers BTW) at WMDC people have no knowledge of when putting these things together. The planning officers and committee will have to take all of this into consideration if and when it grants permission but understanding that the proposal does use all of the land proposed to be re-designated. Also, WMDC HAS to find and grant permission for 95ha of B8 development land on the M62 corridor and the full York Court area (excluding the stadium) is still somewhere short of even doing that!
As TRB had said, this is really good news, and while we knew this might happen and the requirement for WMDC to allow to be developed an additional 95ha was known, it has happened!
'"
They are only short of 5ha unless I am reading the last column on the right wrong which total 90ha :-
consult.wakefield.gov.uk/portal/ ... 0165393417
|
|
Quote Inflatable_Armadillo="Inflatable_Armadillo"bigalf - Don't link the exact area shown in the LDF, which is just the old Newmarket Colliery site area which is not land currently in or reclaimed for agricultural use, to mean that York Court will change their planning application or only get that area to develop in the granting of outline planning permission.
The LDF is one thing and the planning application another entirely!
The LDF is proposing that a large proportion of the land which is also currently (and coincidently) contained within York Court & the Stadium trust's current application be re-designated an employment area for type B8 development. This effectively will potential remove any issues now (or in the future) in terms of the development of this area of land. The proposed ground development being entirely outside of this area is a good thing as well, as in actual fact getting permission to develop something else in an area that has been specifically designated for a certain type of use, is actually harder than getting permission on an area not strictly designated, even in Green Belt! York Court are also currently asking to develop units & offices outside of this area and therefore they will have to (and I am sure will) present a commercial case for the need and requirement to do so, including land ownership boundaries, which the planning policy team (who are different people to the planning officers BTW) at WMDC people have no knowledge of when putting these things together. The planning officers and committee will have to take all of this into consideration if and when it grants permission but understanding that the proposal does use all of the land proposed to be re-designated. Also, WMDC HAS to find and grant permission for 95ha of B8 development land on the M62 corridor and the full York Court area (excluding the stadium) is still somewhere short of even doing that!
As TRB had said, this is really good news, and while we knew this might happen and the requirement for WMDC to allow to be developed an additional 95ha was known, it has happened!
'"
They are only short of 5ha unless I am reading the last column on the right wrong which total 90ha :-
consult.wakefield.gov.uk/portal/ ... 0165393417
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 829 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2014 | Dec 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| This all sounds like great news to me!
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 8487 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2020 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| The way I read it is that Newmarket Lane has been pencilled in for 33 hectares of B8 facilities. Looking at the site plan, the total proposed B8 facilities amounts to 32.74 hectares. Therefore, what the Council have proposed and what Yorkcourt and the Community Trust have proposed is no different.
That could just be me reading it wrong or talking hollyhocks. To be fair, I have no clue around this LDF stuff; I prefer to read the information given by the necessary parties with regards the planning application.
The one thing that does intrigue me is that the link SWC provided is with regards to Spatial Policy, however, in the documentation of the planning app, the "Spatial Policy" statutory response was pretty damning of key areas of the development. One confuzzled person here.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1918 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2023 | Nov 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Sounds like great news for you!. So the council comes good for you after all the wailing on this site 
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 10926 | London Skolars |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2021 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote duke street 10="duke street 10"Sounds like great news for you!. =#BF0040So the council comes good for you becasue of all the wailing
'"
Edited for accuracy! 
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1494 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2009 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2011 | Feb 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I know it's looking that way. But to be fair I think they have begun to open their eyes to the bigger picture.
In truth the only group to do better out of this than the general public of Wakefield is WMDC.
Let's think about what WMDC get out of this project.
1. Increased economic growth to the region of 3%.
2. Increased revenue from the business rates from the businesses which take residence. You could expect this alone to exceed 1M per year.
3. A community stadium (free of charge-with the exception of the land loan which will be repaid in due course).
4. Increased education facilities.
5. The prestige of delivering the much needed community stadium to the gracious people of Wakefield.
When Peter Box gives the announcement in September he will feel like Gaius Julius Caesar returning to Rome. All of this from start to finish will be a product of "his" hard work, but I for one will let him have his moment. He might of joined the party late but it's becoming clear he's come round to our way of thinking.
|
|
|
 |
|