If sky do what they currently do now it will be more likened to the SPL showing the big 4-5 teams. If they did split it then the next division needs to be covered more otherwise can see it being a big turnoff

Ultimately its a money grab, there isn't enough around so the 10 clubs in SL 1 will have the dosh, sl2 will become the championship and over time its funding will decrease, then the 10 in SL1 will want further more of the pie and reduce it to 8, playing each other 4 times to make ends meet.

I'm not adverse to dropping down a division to something that is more our level in terms of resource, as competing in a lower division (not guaranteed) will be more enjoyable than what's been served up over the past 20 years, with a few blips of a decent season in dotted amongst it (2004, 2008 2009, 2017, 2018).

The first paragraph is absolutely on the money and it will definitely end up being SL (with 10 clubs) and a renamed 2nd tier.
Just because they may call it SL2, it will be in just the same position as the Championship is now (or worse) as there is less money to go round.
This is how people force through unwonted changes, wrap the idea up in fancy words, so that it doesn't sound too bad and then, before you know it, you've signed up and then been utterly shafted.
They do say, be careful what you wish for and if we're not careful, this is one of those situations where, we will end up getting screwed over.

As for dropping a division ?

If this were to happen, Trinity would NEVER return to SL.
They have wanted rid of Trinity since we gained promotion and with Sky monies getting tighter and tighter, we are more likely than ever to see the drawbridge pulled up and we need to be on the right side of the bridge if this happens.

I drive past Newmarket every other day and they are putting up units for fun.
What on earth happened to our new ground or, even the BV revamp.
The development could give Trinity a much needed boost, both on and off the field and boy, do we need it.

Like anything the devil is in the detail. As said above its vital the ground improvements happen we need the extra income it will provide. There’s only 4-5 top RL clubs so if we can make the most of our potential we can be there or there abouts.

Up the Trin

Apart from new Stadium ,which is still in the air about been built,were is the potential on the field ,.We are still signing injured 30 year old's and a coach that is taking us backward

Quality in the Academy is the future.

As for the stadium I am neve confident, went through the new development at the top of Stanley and it's absolutely disgraceful how those buildings have circumvented the proposed development. Wakefield council should hang their heads in shame.

If it sits into 10 teams there's no interest from me I like the variety of teams to play I would much prefer a league of 16.

If I take off my Trinity hat and put on my rugby league hat, I would go for a ten-team league and increase the salary cap. One of the problems we have at the moment is that the stars of the game frequently go to Aus; to test themselves against the best and for more money. Take away some of the cash incentive and then make the game better here, by being more competitive, and as a game we will produce more stars.

Let's be honest with ourselves: do you think any fan in St Helens or Wigan or Warrington looks forward to the visit from Wakey? And what about the players? It's just a blip until the next competitive game, and sometimes we benefit from that. The view from anyone outside Wakefield is that we don't bring much to the party and never have.

A sixteen-team is a non-starter. The money-share is too small for everyone and the talent pool isn't there. The fact that we may be left out after the end of the first season is down to us, for poor recruitment, because as long as we finish tenth or higher, we're in. By that point, the stadium may be on the way to completion and we may begin to grow as a club. Until we perform on the field, however, we won't be in it.

A conference system would be more ideal, as there is a prospect of more derbies. Even the top clubs might get sick of endless Wigan/Saints, etc, but then again, if there is a lot riding on every game, maybe not. But what happens when that doesn't improve things? Eight-teams?

You mentioned they point it's about business and finance and not really about the development and participation in sport. Less games less teams I believe will kill the game off totally

On the other hand, a vibrant and exciting league that attracts spectators and sponsors and TV exposure will do that, in theory.

I don't know what the answer is, but whether we take part in the top or second league is in our hands.

Playing each other 3 times will lose the effect of a good derby match it will be boring.

Am I wrong but I read it as a 20 team SL in 2 divisions, so lower division would still be SL , also didn't they say that money differences between the 2 division's would less and that they would try to get a tv deal for the lower division? It would not be like going into the championship

It won’t take them long to make the top division a closed shop. If and we probably will go down I think the chance of getting promoted would be very slim