No wish to insult you at all. I understand your desire for something positive but IMHO Sammut simply isn't it. If you can name one game in which he's played that he's shown anything like the form he showed at Crusaders and Bradford I may reconsider.

I firmly believe in the two games he played v Bradford last year he actually refused to participate - I've never seen such a wilful act in all my years - disgraceful IMHO.

Assuming you have been watching Bradford for a number of years, you will know that on a few occasions Sammut has ripped Wakefield apart (which is presumably why we signed him).
Certainly, allowing Bradford to sign him, just in time for the middle 8's would be a big mistake.
What we have to do, when our new coach is installed is draw a line under what went on under Agar and Webster and start again.
No super stars, no favourites, just those who can and want to paly under the new coach

The guy does have ability but hasn't wanted to play (quite literally at times), as Wakefield want him to, isn't going to be popular with the coaching staff.

The thing is with T Smith, he needs the right partner at Stand Off. Did we not learn that in his first stint with us when a chance pairing with Sykes suddenly unlocked the best of Smith.

Not sure that Sammut is the right partner for Smith

Nail on head Avenger Smith has to have the right half back partner and I don't think Sammut would be saying that cant be any worse than Miller.

That's it then, swop Sammut for Sykes.

Many a true word. . .

I don't think it's the answer but it would probably make us more functional than we currently are.

If and its a big IF he's willing to play properly for us - shown no signs yet. If he did he'd be a massive bonus but I'm not convinced he ever will.

I thought it would be common sense for any coach at a club like Wakefield that we need our best players on the pitch for the longest time they can be. Why Godinet spends half of it on the bench is ludicrous. He would compliment Smith at halfback as he would injext some pace and an ability to take the line on.

Another option would be to play Hall in the centre and move Lyne to the wing [where he would probably be better as he doesn't exactly feed his winger brilliantly and drop Riley. [if you're of the opinion Riley hasn't been upto it. Hall has definitely shown he can't do it at full back, that would allow us to have a look at him at centre and see how lyne and johnstone [our two quickest players go on the wing.

Some good valid points made here and It would be difficult to argue with any of your post, but I'm sure somebody will

No they won't!

(try scorer mode) Bold statement to make that, unless your vain enough to think you know what everybody is thinking.

I was wondering, possibly, that maybe he was being ironic?