Millard

Wrencat Kyle Wood can not lace Gareth Moore's Boots He's super league stats for last year were 14 games [6 for cas] [ 8 for hudds] READ THIS 14 games NO points No Kick's in General play, No assists, HOW can we expect to progress in this position when we are playing somebody above hes weight when he as being DUMPED by another superleage club who released him for not being good enough ?

What about him?

And signed Tommy Lee as a replacement! A question mark ver Hudds decision making I think.

As far as Wood not being good enough to lace Moore's laces, give it a rest , they are both much of a muchness, at this stage I wouldn't say either was any better than the other. Saying that I don't know if you went today but Wood played well, showed some good touches and caused a few problems, anyway what's with the constant need by you to try to put the boot in to Wood before he's played a proper game for us, there's just no need for it.

A few points

1.You are clearly a great supporter of Gareth Moore.
2.Your stats are complete b0ll0x,for starters he didnt even play for Cas in 2011,it was 2010 and the rest, well youve just made it up.
3.Clearly you are bitter that Wood appears to be infront of Moore in the pecking order.
4.Didnt Gareth Moore get released by another super league club???

READ THIS -- DONT POST WHEN YOUVE HAD ONE TOO MANY SHERBERTS.

FWIW, we had kyle wood on loan for a couple of month during 2010 and he was decent. Effective off the bench, added a spark to us. A bit of a Sam Obst esk player. Don't know too much about Moore. But think Wood will make an impact for you next season.

From our pov i thought Wood added some spark into your attack when he came on and certainly didn't look like "a boy playing a mans game" or out of his depth.
I will also say just because a player was released by another club it doesn't always mean they won't/can't improve and come back better players and worthy of SL.

Yeah we got rid of Atkins and Bridge.......... look at how well they have grown in ability.

Sorry, but that's cack - Millard had absolutely no power or strength, hence his utter inability to fill the void that losing Atkins created; Millard is quick, but not in any way able to carry the ball up like a battering ram, which is how JK used Atkins.

You're comparing apples and oranges.

Sorry, but that's cack - Millard had absolutely no power or strength, hence his utter inability to fill the void that losing Atkins created; Millard is quick, but not in any way able to carry the ball up like a battering ram, which is how JK used Atkins.

You're comparing apples and oranges.

unfortunately the battering ram centre philosophy seems to have been used with walshaw too, hence the fact he was unable to finish off a simple two on one overlap.

sorry to say that in the skills department, yesterday showed the huge gulf that exists.

I'm not sure he had absolutely no power - he may not be a battering ram but his footwork often puts him in space to push defenders away. I don't remember ever seeing Collis play but if he's as effective as Millard I think you'll be doing well.

Harsh - that was purely down to Walshaw having a brainfart; he had options either side and didn't make the decision in time, so ended up taking the tackle.

I didn't see a gulf.

Everyone impressed me except Raleigh, Morton and James.