And how many Wakey fans were dancing on the pitch taunting the Cas fans when we were relegated on that fateful night?

I can see where you are coming from but i think that is different because our fans were celebrating our success rather than just the demise of others. Had we beat anybody else that day to stay up i think we would have celebrated the same.

Big man eh, were you one of those Cas fans who along with women and some kids that were spoiling for a fight at the jungle when the Wakey fans were making their way out of the ground after beating you 18-0 with 11 men, or were you one of the heroes' that were lobbing beer glasses at the men women and kids that were unfortunate to be passing that pub on WR on their way home, put that with your beer can throwing legion plus your homephobic chanting army, I don't think that puts you in any position to criticise Wakey fans do you?.

About the same number of Cas fans who would have done the same if the result had gone the other way.

We all have our idiots. Its time that we all stopped the snipeing and wished each other the best with our respecive franchise applications. SL will be worse without both Wakefield and Castleford.

It says in the Barnsley Chronicle this morning that with doubts surrounding the suitability of BV and a delay over their application for a new ground at NM it is thought that Wakey have based their SL application on an initial groundshare at Oakwell with Barnsley FC.

Not as many as you think Big Man!!
We were allowed to celebrate our (relative) success.

Interesting,considering it's coming from one of the Wakefield community team (I believe).

Are the Richardson's still on the Community Trust, if so has there been any action to remove them, legal or otherwise.

Community team as opposed to Community trust.

On what ground could you legally remove him, despite your endless posturing he is yet to be proved of any serious wrong doing.

As far as I'm concerned Teds input on the community trust would be a positive thing though personally I doubt he will stay long term if at all. That said it's his choice, he can't be made to go.

Despite your glum attempts to pin everything on Ted it doesn't wash and your desire for legal action is frankly laughable and shows your utter lack of grasp on the subject.

Give it a rest and move on.

Touchy, touchy, you give yourself away far too easily.
I simply asked a question, don't get yourself all hot and bothered.
Perhaps not everyone agrees with you, including on the Trust and perhaps there are things that can be done legally.
Either way if you don't know, don't feel the need to pop up and answer at my every post, as it clearly wasn't aimed for a response from you.
Now sit quietly.

and there's a whole lot better experience in the shop now...without the ted family members there.

i don't know the in's and out's vasty so can't comment .. i just know that what ted did was not correct and he should have no further part with anything to do with the club or charitable trust.

Can people who have been declared bankrupt be part of a charitable trust?

Give myself away as what exactly?

A Ted loyalist, much as you want to believe that I doubt it - I think he has a bit still to offer but it's clearly unfeasible him stopping on IMO. The shoot first ask questions later attitude you and others possess makes that abundantly clear.

I accept the Richardsons have had their day, perhaps you should too!

My issue with you regards principle not personalities so I really don't care if people agree, I care that fairness is applied to all not just those on your special friends list.

Don't flatter yourself, I'm happy to ignore most of what you post, but being a forum I reserve the right to respond when applicable.

Good day.