Just because you don't see it doesn't mean it isn't there. However you're right in the sense that it's pretty much irrelevant because it won't get built because it was never meant to be built.

Well of course they have just like they identified Thornes College which they didn't own and NM which didn't happen. Forgive me if I'm less than impressed.

Also why not build the stadium on this land earmarked for parking - just an idea.

You are not the only one with friends of friends plus I believe the planning threshold for temporary car parking is less than a stadium especially where there isn’t one at the moment.
I am sure you will come up with another avenue of objection based on an artist’s impression. What about the Wakefield logo which is clearly too big for the area it is located

Nice try, yep I'm the bad guy on this subject and you're the hero - can't see many buying into you being a hero - me as the bad guy, probably.

Big enough to accommodate Trinity? In locations in Wakefield, or the Wakefield District?

Ask the club they know the areas allocated for parking.
I think Vastman is a manipulator who has sadly alienated a lot of supporters who no longer post leaving just a few of his entourage who agree with his many questionable assumptions.
He now supports our relocation away from that nasty council because that is more important than the possibility that the club could lose its SL status
Don’t bother reverting to type by trying to insult me because I really don’t care there is more to worry about in this conservative controlled country than what you think

Newmarket?

Sorry but I have no idea where you are referring too- areas allocated for parking???

Funny because someone in the club knew apparently. They must be keeping secrets from you. I will say I believe one of the areas proposed is partly owned by the council and partly by a third party.
Whilst you are on any idea where we will be playing next season.

That reads like "Carter, you know nothing, people in the club know more than you, they don't want you to know, you are a mug. I am prepared to make up the rumour that some land earmarked for parking is owned by WMDC and a 3rd party (though surely they would be a 2nd party, in a 2 party ownership). Oh, and by the way, where are we playing next season mate?".

What is most interesting about your recent posts is that they are constructed in a way to create confusion and division amongst those who are debating the issue. akin to the political style favoured by public figures ... divide and conquer... isolate and discredit the leader... confuse the main issue with a plethora of irrelevant but,very loud, side issues!

I am unable to deduce a motive in your posts that cannot be described as nefarious! Subversive at best!

The only way we can come through this is stick to the game pllan... don't buy any dummies and stay focussed

I believe the statement to the third party was while they were buying there season ticket in the club shop. The sales person concerned did not know the person they were talking to actually owns the said land.

Have you bought yours yet John are are you sticking to your statement

And all you need to know is right there in the first sentence ‘apparently’ !

I have tremendous admiration for MC but I wish he would stop posting on here. It does not not help to get in to arguments with nobodies like scarlet. MC should be above that. Leave the rest of us to defend the club.