Picking up on anything that looks like a crusher tackle or causes injury to the neck/spine area is the new fad.
It's taken over from the chicken wing tackle, team warning and attempting to play the ball with your foot.

But in this case where is the intent as there is no downward pressure on the neck and he is put to ground on his side so this must mean that reasonable doubt must apply

I mentioned Cas cos they happen to be the next opposition and the next game is always the best one to see the inconsistency.

You know the reason.
Lyne is wearing a Trinity shirt.

I watched the game back on Trin TV both are absolutely nothing. How can Lynn get 2 games he's been clean for 150 matches. It's one of the softest bans I've ever seen. Won't say anything too out of order but rfl panal should be ashamed

RFL Disciplinary - consistently inconsistent

They would not bother if Wigan had have been tackling.

No news yet on appeal. Can't see what there is to ban!

I agree. But it is a tough job to win an appeal. If it was simple they'd have got it right first time.

still got the ban

The decision is ridiculous.

Touch and pass tomorrow then.

Wonder if Sky will mention it?

Knew the appeal would fail, since Lyne doesn't have the surname O'Loughlin.