Would be suprised as we play wolves who may not let Riley play.

www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/s ... -1-6623774 'CASTLEFORD TIGERS are hoping to keep half-back Marc Sneyd – but Wakefield Trinity Wildcats have said goodbye to winger Peter Fox.....'

www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/s ... -1-6623774 'CASTLEFORD TIGERS are hoping to keep half-back Marc Sneyd – but Wakefield Trinity Wildcats have said goodbye to winger Peter Fox.....'

Fox, unlike the others you mention, at least put the effort in, even though he did come up with some cock ups. Personally he would've been way down on the list of players I would've looked to have got rid of.

What I find confusing is how the club hasn't confirmed his departure? Anything in it?

fox himself has said in private he won't play for wakey again, expects to go to fev, very critical of agar too but I guess he will be, I know he on a big contract too so surely they will want him off there books ,a confidence player I think that obviously doesn't feel he getting right support and back up at wakey which is ashamed, I know he didn't even go to magic weekend

I agree with him putting the effort in but, the guy has been panned on here more times than I can remember but, we have some kind of belated player worship going on.
The guy was excellent in his first spell here but, despite some very good games and excellent tries, his second spell hasn't been as good and as with any winger (or full back), his errors have been exaggerated due to where they take place (ie in our "20"icon_wink.gif and many have called for his head long before now.
I'm not saying that they were right, other than passing comment on the fact that, having had so much criticism, it is strange that his stock has suddenly risen.

Couldn't agree more. It's a giggle.

Foxy got off to a solid start this year but last year I recall he was being blamed for single handedly losing us games! I was led to believe he was a Elston signing on a large wedge, so some sort of settlement must have been reached?

I don't think it's strange to praise Fox for what he did at Wakefield, although I accept his first spell here was better. Perhaps he had better service then and a centre who didn't leave him in no mans land defensively.
Just think it a bit of a shambles that everybody and their auntie seems to know he has gone but still no announcement from the club.
We don't know what has gone on behind the scenes so it's no use speculating but if he has left because his standard of rugby has fallen then the exit door must be open for one or two more.

No Daddycool to refute such rumours these days I've noticed.

I've heard he as gone to Batley for........






a tin of biscuits ! Boom-boom....... I'll get me coat.

So if that's the case, why didn't we keep Fox and use the money to pay Agar off?

Take it he hasn't gone then and he will be in the squad on Sunday
for Riley who won't be allowed to play?

Journalism relies on tip offs. Get some right, get some wrong. Doesn't do the journlist any favours if they get it wrong.

Don't think its a Foxy love in its a fact that he is better than what we are using instead of him.I always winced when the high ball went up to Foxy you never knew if he would take it or drop it.The one thing you cant knock him for was his effort going forward to take the weight off the forwards or going for the try line.Dont think Im alone in wondering why Agar has put Mathers on the wing and not kept Foxy ? strange indeed.