Either put specific points forward or leave the thread alone, you are taking in riddles and have offered nothing other that "respect" and "moron" hardly pointing out what the gripe is.

If you have valid claims/points contact the club.

Lets see if the ref has got any balls and we will leave it at that.

I can only presume he did not see eye to eye with the official, in which case its best left alone.

The point is that however poor the refereeing decisions are, the coach shouldn't be approaching the ref at half time. He could have easily got himself sent from the field for the 2nd half. The decisions have been made and however controversial are not going to be reversed, so the coach should accept them, as the Wakey players did at the time.

The penalty count wasn't high because of lack of discipline or respect, but because the ref was incompetent, this not being the first time we have been on the end of this particular refs strange decisions.

To say Morrison is a moron and should be banned is just ridiculous.

So when the ref dose his review of the game i bet there are no more than 2 mistakes by the ref out of the 34 penalty's

Glenn was making a point about the chicken wing tackle that went un-penalised and wanted to discuss this with the ref at half time to which he is entitled to do so, he did not "Chase him down" the ref was walking off next to Glenn but rudely just waved him away and dismissed him, I think you'll find that the only complaint going in will be from Wakefield about the ref and not the reverse

Your not offering a constructive argument, "Mammy's bored now"

ban him now

He wasn't abusive, I was there and 5m from the conversation

Where as you were probably at home taking an afternnon nap after your lunchtime bottle

If the U20's had all those penalties and you think that Wigan had an extra player on the field (Ref), does that not show how well the team really played!! And I do not feel it is disrespectful for the coach to go up to the referee - he needs to know what the team is doing wrong(the Refs point of view) to be able to correct the fault. And who better to ask!

Agree 100%, they did play well, unfortunately the ref was not consistant in his decissions, what was a penalty against wakefield was not against wigan, the 2nd sin binning was bemusing to say the least as no warning was given and no indication as to why he was binned made by the ref (I heard someone say it was due to the player "reffing the game" )
In a game where the penalty count is so skewed you would expect the side with the most penalties against to be on the loosing side, the fact they won shows how much better at playing rugby they were than the ref gave them credit for

Totally agree the coach does need to know what his side is getting penalised for, but the way in which Glen approached the ref does not set a good example. Unlike what 'financialtimes' states Glen did race over to the ref showing his frustration, I understand it is hard when the ref was a total clown but maturity and composure would be best. Wait until your inside and go to the ref's changing room and ask for a word to clarify the problems. I have no problem with Glen at all, and think he will develop into a good coach once he realises he is not a player now and his frustrations must be put across in a more positive manner.

We both know financial times is a liar

That seems an infinitely more sensible response that suggesting that he's a moron who should be banned from the game.

Hare&hounds - you're obviously connected to the Wigan camp in some way; care to elucidate?