Yes they would but regardless of what happens to Crusaders they would get their money back if and when the ground is sold.

Speaking of the value of good PR - check out rlnumber 9 - ouch!rl

so, back on topic (before we turn this into a Tigers or Crusaders related thread) - I agree that Wakey have certainly upped the ante regarded PR over the last couple of months but think it could be too late for you guys. If AG was in charge a season ago it would have given the RFL a bit more to think about.

Anyway, as most of you like to think on here - it's all smoke n mirrors at Tigers so you've nothing to worry about when Saville's present their assessment next week.

I'm not quite sure the club has upped things that much. Certainly there are more stories on the website, but it's mainly fluff stuff, as it was before with stuff going on in Cats, and whatever the Dolls are up to, the same stuff as the last few years, and I'm not sure anything is really filtering through to the wider public.

Regarding the stadium. There is no mention here of the agreement with Barnsley, which instantly gives us a SL quality ground.
Add to this the other much improved off-field activities and our "score" should improve.

if wakefield go so should quins and crusaders but we all know it wont happen to the other 2.

And so should cas to be honest were both in the same position re ground. Now that could happen but I don't think it will. If one goes the other should if it's being done fairly and without the inclusion of the expansion clubs in the mix. Of course neither should go but this is rugby league were talking about here!

Totally agree.