FORUMS > Wakefield Trinity > Community Stadium plans |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 15521 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2020 | May 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
50722_1319672516.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_50722.jpg |
|
| Quote: Sandal Wild Cat "The thing that gets me is that the vast majority of stadium threads have had little or no substance and have rolled on to 20 plus pages sometimes. This news is HUGE and nobody has even clicked?????.'"
In fairness, quite a few people predicted this would happen (myself included) so probably felt no need to comment; the lengthy threads you're referring to are artificially padded by inane propaganda from our Castleford Liaison Officers, so not a fair reflection of WTW fans interest in the topic.
This is great news and has probably panned out just as Yorkcourt hoped - now roll on September!
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5778 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
46978_1481681744.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_46978.jpg |
|
| I wonder if the club think ,if they get the outline planning sorted in September ,it will allow them more opportunities in the transfer market,it would look a better sell to any potential player.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 13798 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
29100_1291104497.jpg 1/10:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_29100.jpg |
|
| Quote: Shifty Cat "I wonder if the club think ,if they get the outline planning sorted in September ,it will allow them more opportunities in the transfer market,it would look a better sell to any potential player.'"
It certainly would be a boost, the downside being lot of the better players available will have been snapped up by then.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 1470 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 1970 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| I don't tend to post on topic's with regard to the council and political in's and out. It isn't because i'm not interested but because the reality is i don't have the knowledge and experience to know what knock on effects it will have for Wakefield Trinity.
But i've had a browse at the document and i'd say on the whole there looks to be snippets which suggest it bodes well for the OPP in September. If Sandal Cat & Armadillo are confident then it must be good news. So lets keep our fingers crossed come and hopefully we'll be building soon
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 10926 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2021 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
15993_1515231183.jpeg [color=#400000:2dasnjxb]"Wakefields Sporting Crusader"[/color:2dasnjxb]
[b:2dasnjxb][color=#FF0000:2dasnjxb]For the latest details on the Stadium for Wakefield campaign, log onto [url:2dasnjxb]http://www.swag-online.co.uk[/url:2dasnjxb][/color:2dasnjxb][/b:2dasnjxb]
[b:2dasnjxb][color=#0000FF:2dasnjxb]For the latest details on the Supporters Trust, log onto [url:2dasnjxb]http://wakefield.rlfans.com[/url:2dasnjxb][/color:2dasnjxb][/b:2dasnjxb]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_15993.jpeg |
|
| I would note this:
We have all spent much energy in venting about things the council have done to make life difficult - especially in relation to Thornes Park and, more recently, with regard to the possible ground share.
Although it took some persuading, the council accepted what our 'Trinity' (Club / Trust / Developer) were telling them - i.e. give us the planning permission and we'll give Wakefield a stadium.
This LDF plan. although not something we didn't know about, now becomes a major part in the overall jigsaw that is needed for Newmarket to happen. We should, therefore, be gratious towards our local authority when news such as this arises as these are exactly the type of actions which we hoped to bring our council to make as a result of all the campiagning we have done.
The posters on here are correct - do not underestimate the significance of this news!
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1347 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2022 | May 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
39793_1491679334.jpg "Castleford's biggest home crowd of the 1991-1992 season wasn't quite 12,000 while on average they'd sit around 6000 but the noise, the chanting and the singing just blows you away" - Tawera Nikau "Standing Tall"
"I can tell you the atmosphere was extraordinary at Wheldon Road on big days. The ground held around 15,000 people, every one of them close to the action on the field and the noise would be enough to send a rumble through the town" - Malcolm Reilly "Reilly - A Life in Rugby League":d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_39793.jpg |
|
| Quote: TRB "I would note this:
We have all spent much energy in venting about things the council have done to make life difficult - especially in relation to Thornes Park and, more recently, with regard to the possible ground share.
Although it took some persuading, the council accepted what our 'Trinity' (Club / Trust / Developer) were telling them - i.e. give us the planning permission and we'll give Wakefield a stadium.
This LDF plan. although not something we didn't know about, now becomes a major part in the overall jigsaw that is needed for Newmarket to happen. We should, therefore, be gratious towards our local authority when news such as this arises as these are exactly the type of actions which we hoped to bring our council to make as a result of all the campiagning we have done.
The posters on here are correct - do not underestimate the significance of this news!
If this proposal goes ahead will York Court still be happy to fund a Stadium when they are only getting land to develop 34% (Square Footage) of the original development?
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 10926 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2021 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
15993_1515231183.jpeg [color=#400000:2dasnjxb]"Wakefields Sporting Crusader"[/color:2dasnjxb]
[b:2dasnjxb][color=#FF0000:2dasnjxb]For the latest details on the Stadium for Wakefield campaign, log onto [url:2dasnjxb]http://www.swag-online.co.uk[/url:2dasnjxb][/color:2dasnjxb][/b:2dasnjxb]
[b:2dasnjxb][color=#0000FF:2dasnjxb]For the latest details on the Supporters Trust, log onto [url:2dasnjxb]http://wakefield.rlfans.com[/url:2dasnjxb][/color:2dasnjxb][/b:2dasnjxb]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_15993.jpeg |
|
| Quote: bigalf "If this proposal goes ahead will York Court still be happy to fund a Stadium when they are only getting land to develop 34% (Square Footage) of the original development?'"
And what gives you the impression that a) they will only develop 34% of the total or b) that they can't do the deal to build it? You clearly think you have inside information!
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 12504 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
2358_1651040874.jpg Wakefield TRINITY:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_2358.jpg |
Moderator
|
| Quote: TRB "And what gives you the impression that a) they will only develop 34% of the total or b) that they can't do the deal to build it? You clearly think you have inside information!'"
... or is praying like hell we dont get the Stadium!
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 48326 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2023 | Oct 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
1357.jpg [b:34xc0vwf]Doubt everything, even this[/b:34xc0vwf]:1357.jpg |
|
| Quote: TRB " You clearly think you have inside information!'"
TBF, that seems to be true of every poster on every one of these threads on both boards …
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1347 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2022 | May 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
39793_1491679334.jpg "Castleford's biggest home crowd of the 1991-1992 season wasn't quite 12,000 while on average they'd sit around 6000 but the noise, the chanting and the singing just blows you away" - Tawera Nikau "Standing Tall"
"I can tell you the atmosphere was extraordinary at Wheldon Road on big days. The ground held around 15,000 people, every one of them close to the action on the field and the noise would be enough to send a rumble through the town" - Malcolm Reilly "Reilly - A Life in Rugby League":d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_39793.jpg |
|
|
Quote: TRB "And what gives you the impression that a) they will only develop 34% of the total or b) that they can't do the deal to build it? You clearly think you have inside information!'"
The LDP plan shows an area which only covers Units 1a, 1b, 3 and 7 shown on the submitted plans aprox 681,000 sq ft out of a total of 1,974,000 sq ft
I can look at a plan and compare it with another!
By the way I hope we both get our stadiums !!!
www.wakefield.gov.uk/Planning/Sp ... foMode=xml
|
|
Quote: TRB "And what gives you the impression that a) they will only develop 34% of the total or b) that they can't do the deal to build it? You clearly think you have inside information!'"
The LDP plan shows an area which only covers Units 1a, 1b, 3 and 7 shown on the submitted plans aprox 681,000 sq ft out of a total of 1,974,000 sq ft
I can look at a plan and compare it with another!
By the way I hope we both get our stadiums !!!
www.wakefield.gov.uk/Planning/Sp ... foMode=xml
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 21024 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
41119.jpg A dog is not considered a good dog because he is a good barker. A man is not considered a good man because he is a good talker - Buddha:41119.jpg |
Moderator
|
| I wonder, hypothetically, whether the developers have worked out the lower level for the development and entered bigger plans so that they can be seen to be cutting back to meet public and council opinion.
The smaller initial development doesn't mean they can't do the stadium. Doesn't have to be an either/or.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4259 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2020 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
33791.jpg [b:1swa1vwo]Change is inevitable
...except from a vending machine![/b:1swa1vwo]
[quote="BillyRhino":1swa1vwo]So in best IA mode ..<.Possibley World Class, could be the greatest thing since sliced bread....am personally very excited, and confidently expect him to prove my predictions are bang on target.... Alternatively he could be rubbish>
IA mode off. [/quote:1swa1vwo]:33791.jpg |
|
| Quote: bigalf "If this proposal goes ahead will York Court still be happy to fund a Stadium when they are only getting land to develop 34% (Square Footage) of the original development?'"
bigalf - Don't link the exact area shown in the LDF, which is just the old Newmarket Colliery site area which is not land currently in or reclaimed for agricultural use, to mean that York Court will change their planning application or only get that area to develop in the granting of outline planning permission.
The LDF is one thing and the planning application another entirely!
The LDF is proposing that a large proportion of the land which is also currently (and coincidently) contained within York Court & the Stadium trust's current application be re-designated an employment area for type B8 development. This effectively will potential remove any issues now (or in the future) in terms of the development of this area of land. The proposed ground development being entirely outside of this area is a good thing as well, as in actual fact getting permission to develop something else in an area that has been specifically designated for a certain type of use, is actually harder than getting permission on an area not strictly designated, even in Green Belt! York Court are also currently asking to develop units & offices outside of this area and therefore they will have to (and I am sure will) present a commercial case for the need and requirement to do so, including land ownership boundaries, which the planning policy team (who are different people to the planning officers BTW) at WMDC people have no knowledge of when putting these things together. The planning officers and committee will have to take all of this into consideration if and when it grants permission but understanding that the proposal does use all of the land proposed to be re-designated. Also, WMDC HAS to find and grant permission for 95ha of B8 development land on the M62 corridor and the full York Court area (excluding the stadium) is still somewhere short of even doing that!
As TRB had said, this is really good news, and while we knew this might happen and the requirement for WMDC to allow to be developed an additional 95ha was known, it has happened!
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1347 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2022 | May 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
39793_1491679334.jpg "Castleford's biggest home crowd of the 1991-1992 season wasn't quite 12,000 while on average they'd sit around 6000 but the noise, the chanting and the singing just blows you away" - Tawera Nikau "Standing Tall"
"I can tell you the atmosphere was extraordinary at Wheldon Road on big days. The ground held around 15,000 people, every one of them close to the action on the field and the noise would be enough to send a rumble through the town" - Malcolm Reilly "Reilly - A Life in Rugby League":d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_39793.jpg |
|
|
Quote: Inflatable_Armadillo "bigalf - Don't link the exact area shown in the LDF, which is just the old Newmarket Colliery site area which is not land currently in or reclaimed for agricultural use, to mean that York Court will change their planning application or only get that area to develop in the granting of outline planning permission.
The LDF is one thing and the planning application another entirely!
The LDF is proposing that a large proportion of the land which is also currently (and coincidently) contained within York Court & the Stadium trust's current application be re-designated an employment area for type B8 development. This effectively will potential remove any issues now (or in the future) in terms of the development of this area of land. The proposed ground development being entirely outside of this area is a good thing as well, as in actual fact getting permission to develop something else in an area that has been specifically designated for a certain type of use, is actually harder than getting permission on an area not strictly designated, even in Green Belt! York Court are also currently asking to develop units & offices outside of this area and therefore they will have to (and I am sure will) present a commercial case for the need and requirement to do so, including land ownership boundaries, which the planning policy team (who are different people to the planning officers BTW) at WMDC people have no knowledge of when putting these things together. The planning officers and committee will have to take all of this into consideration if and when it grants permission but understanding that the proposal does use all of the land proposed to be re-designated. Also, WMDC HAS to find and grant permission for 95ha of B8 development land on the M62 corridor and the full York Court area (excluding the stadium) is still somewhere short of even doing that!
As TRB had said, this is really good news, and while we knew this might happen and the requirement for WMDC to allow to be developed an additional 95ha was known, it has happened!
They are only short of 5ha unless I am reading the last column on the right wrong which total 90ha :-
consult.wakefield.gov.uk/portal/ ... 0165393417
|
|
Quote: Inflatable_Armadillo "bigalf - Don't link the exact area shown in the LDF, which is just the old Newmarket Colliery site area which is not land currently in or reclaimed for agricultural use, to mean that York Court will change their planning application or only get that area to develop in the granting of outline planning permission.
The LDF is one thing and the planning application another entirely!
The LDF is proposing that a large proportion of the land which is also currently (and coincidently) contained within York Court & the Stadium trust's current application be re-designated an employment area for type B8 development. This effectively will potential remove any issues now (or in the future) in terms of the development of this area of land. The proposed ground development being entirely outside of this area is a good thing as well, as in actual fact getting permission to develop something else in an area that has been specifically designated for a certain type of use, is actually harder than getting permission on an area not strictly designated, even in Green Belt! York Court are also currently asking to develop units & offices outside of this area and therefore they will have to (and I am sure will) present a commercial case for the need and requirement to do so, including land ownership boundaries, which the planning policy team (who are different people to the planning officers BTW) at WMDC people have no knowledge of when putting these things together. The planning officers and committee will have to take all of this into consideration if and when it grants permission but understanding that the proposal does use all of the land proposed to be re-designated. Also, WMDC HAS to find and grant permission for 95ha of B8 development land on the M62 corridor and the full York Court area (excluding the stadium) is still somewhere short of even doing that!
As TRB had said, this is really good news, and while we knew this might happen and the requirement for WMDC to allow to be developed an additional 95ha was known, it has happened!
They are only short of 5ha unless I am reading the last column on the right wrong which total 90ha :-
consult.wakefield.gov.uk/portal/ ... 0165393417
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 829 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2014 | Dec 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
38576_1362166976.gif What's confusing you is the nature of my game:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_38576.gif |
|
| This all sounds like great news to me!
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 8487 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2020 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
12205_1307822450.png [img:32iwt8q2]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v623/fullyitfc/cas-4-1.jpg[/img:32iwt8q2]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_12205.png |
|
| The way I read it is that Newmarket Lane has been pencilled in for 33 hectares of B8 facilities. Looking at the site plan, the total proposed B8 facilities amounts to 32.74 hectares. Therefore, what the Council have proposed and what Yorkcourt and the Community Trust have proposed is no different.
That could just be me reading it wrong or talking hollyhocks. To be fair, I have no clue around this LDF stuff; I prefer to read the information given by the necessary parties with regards the planning application.
The one thing that does intrigue me is that the link SWC provided is with regards to Spatial Policy, however, in the documentation of the planning app, the "Spatial Policy" statutory response was pretty damning of key areas of the development. One confuzzled person here.
|
|
|
|
|
|