Spot on there with that earth shattering statement, what they should do for us though is be consistant, the only consistency this bloke shows towards us is to constantly penalise us for anything and everything whereas at the same time let the opposition get away with it. A good example of it was yesterday although you people sat at home would not have seen it, but from the back of the sticks where the Wakey FANS were we could see that the markers were never square here is your starter for 10 how many times were they penalised for it 0 thats a zero, on the other hand were we not sqaure at the play the ball, course we werent but did we get penalised? answers on a postcard please. Leeds won because over the 80 mins they were the better team they scored 6tries to our 5, well done Leeds, we were punished for our indiscretions were Leeds. All you ask for is consistency did we get it yesterday with this thing, or if you like do we ever get it from him no never, the sooner that thing is dumped back over the channel or preferably in it the better off we shall be, there are better refs in the championship.

we lost so lets blame the ref syndrome will kick in, but then we did see some reasons for complaint no doubt Leeds would of done if they had lost,

I'm still under the impression that Childs is fast becoming our best ref in the game, not because we have won under him, more than he has the balls to stand up teams that want to get away with spoiling tactics

its so easy to want a player sin binned to gain an advantage for our selves, that when we feel we have been let down by the professional foul and he has sent him to the bin, we blame the ref,

I enjoyed that game so much I think I'll go again

While you may not be far wrong or even right how would you explain away the "not standing square calls" quite clearly when we attacked the Leeds line in the second half Mr Ally seemed to miss the old whistle and ignore.

Anyway time to move onwards and upwards.

personally think alibert is terrible, and therefore expect nothing other than the pathetic performances he puts in each week.

as for refereeing in general all we ask is that if you are going to penalise for holding down you must penalise ALL of them, from the first minute to the last. the same goes for all these technical penalties. markers not square, off side at PTB etc.

it is the selective decision making which annoys the supporters.

to outsiders the game is completely incomprehensible because of these inconsistencies. if casual spectators tune in they will turn off in no time in utter confusion.

totally agree ,when leeds take the tap ,he was a metre in front of the 20 ,should of been retaken ,wakey were robbed

in the second half dont think wakefield or leeds played any better or worse than they did in the first half. some of the leeds trys were given by the ref in penalties, allthough we didnt benefit for leeds offences of the same kind. The winning try should have gone to video no matter what cos it was the most crucial point in the game. SCREAMS double movement. Hes a disgrace to rugby league, the players are expected to be at there best and perform, so the same should be expected of the ref!

We simply want consistency. If he penalises Wakey for holding down / markers not square then should have been same when Leeds commited those offences. But he didn't.
But I concur with others - poor defence particularly on our right cost us the game. 39 mins 58 secs try for Hall is just 1 we should have prevented. Blanch may have scored 2 but conceded more.

can't believe we haven't burnt him yet or have we

Not that I dissagree with you, as I never saw the full second half. But out of interest were you moaning earlier on in the season about Mr Child also? considering what you have just posted was exactly what happend to Leeds at your place.

Didums, ever thought your just EDIT IF YOU WANT T^O DODGE THE SWARE FILTER THEN GO ONTO SOUTHSTANDERS.COM . EDIT MUTLEY

Forgot the amazing ref performance at your place earlier in the season. Easily forgotten.