Interesting that in the RFL report it mentions that it was Oli Wilkes that started it all by punching Mr Moore in the scrum (unusual name for a body part I know ), so obviously no love lost their

Totally bizarre.
Lms gets less of a punishment for a head butt, surely far worse than a punch or so the grading suggests!
At the same meeting Kirkpatrick gets a fine but no ban for "striking", surely this means punch and coyle gets one match and no fine for a high tackle.
In summary Moore and Qakefield come off worst for what was probably the least offence.
My concern with appealing would be that they would increase his punishment as their thought processes appear non existent.

Maybe they thought that Moore was the instigator?

Read the report!! It states that Moore was retaliating to a punch from Wilkes in the scrum

Well that's Richard's story anyway................and he's sticking to it

chill out all last time we came home from qimms we ended up loosing 2 players one of whom ran off to daddy

Not sure who started what, I was too busy following play to see what happened. Neither did I see the SLS either, so I personally cannot comment what went on. What was noticeable though was after the dust had settled and Smith had listened to the tj was that Quinns were awarded the pen, and on that basis maybe thats why RM got fined more than that head the ball. Just a thought.

Yep, that's why I reffered to there being no love lost. Think it was Celtic away when they both appeared to be rather black around the eye area

Not something im accused of very often