The point of electronic board is not to get points. That's just the criteria to show progress and improvement.

The reason IMG put them on the list is it is a potential major income source.
Static boards are sold for the season. There is a limit to what people will pay and you can only have a limited number per season.
LED allows you to sell space by the minute. If we are in SL and on Sky or BBC, the revenue from those boards could be massive if you market it right.

I guess the marketing team will know what income we can generate. I think Matt Ellis will have already looked at the pros and cons

That’s right and if your Leeds who are on tv 20 times a season even when having a poor year it’s not too shabby. Trinity who would get 4/5 not so much.

I always wondered why it wasn’t a level playing field and all teams in regular season don’t get an equal split. In a way it’s keeping the top at the top and making it harder for others to compete without the sky money, televised advertising and sponsorship boosts that comes with that.

Troj, the first part of your post falls down seeing as all games are now on Sky.....

Yes. As they are now all on Sky it doesn't matter, but to answer the question, it wasn't even because Sky weren't doing it to be fair. They were doing it to get most viewers so picked the best game.

You are not going to show Wakefield v Salford instead of Wigan v Srs or Leeds Bradford.

The best game? I find it hard to believe that's the criteria they have used over the years when you look at some of sky's selection. I think it's probably more to do with the fact that they have seen trends when the likes of Leeds etc are on, TV audiences are probably better but that's fair enough, it's all about viewing figures at the end of the day for them.

OP asking about date https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/ ... ge-4614697 Clubs October 22, announced next day

OP asking about date https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/ ... ge-4614697 Clubs October 22, announced next day

That does worry me though.
I heard it and cringed a bit.

He (or someone in his team) needs to be all over the IMG criteria. And his statement here implies he is not.

The one thing in our favour and alot will dissagree is that the rfl are not clean and although this is a img thing the rfl will be involved and they will like the fact mr ellis is spending the dough

It was only confirmed last week, perhaps it was changed till after the season following such feedback.

Nah. It's clear in the handbook.
But even so, simple logic says it can't be before the grand final.

I'm not having a go at him. But this is important.
We don't want to be in a situation like Cas where points aren't considered because you didn't understand the process.

I don't mind Ellis not knowing but if he doesn't, just like other things at the club, he needs to get someone in who does.

Seriously, how do you get that from one sentence in a radio interview? He quite obviously is all over the IMG stuff which is why he's meeting with IMG in the first place... And by the way go look on the website, they are posting articles on each of the IMG criteria, which I've only see us do (and cas very poorly). His comment made sense to me, if he met with IMG and they confirmed we would be replacing London next season regardless, it would make the playoffs pretty pointless, which is why he said it probably wouldn't be communicated to fans, I'm not sure I see the issue with what he's said.

Seriously........ what he said was incorrect by a long way. That's how I get it.
He is very much all over achieving the points, and is doing a great job of it.
But if he and his team don't know the rules he'll apply that effort in the wrong direction.

You don't have to defend him. I'm not having a go. But in this case he was wrong about something that is important. And he needs to be better.

Same as Sam Burgess. He made a mistake yesterday (or someone in his team did). In another game it could have cost them. It doesn't make him a bad coach, but he needs to be tighter on that bit in future.

I've just relistened to his interview from 4th March on BBC, go listen to that interview again rather than take a snippet from it and come back with the same comments. You can say he's wrong but the thing you are not getting on all of this is that you really only know what is put out in the public domain on the IMG stuff, if you think what you know and what the owner of RL clubs know is the same thing, then you are seriously deluded. If you think what you know and what Tony Sutton knows and was able to communicate with clubs last month is the same thing, again you are deluded. Final scorings for clubs are made post season yes, I'm not sure if that was ever in dispute to be honest? What was in dispute is if team A in the championship score higher than team B in the SL in those scorings, will they replace them for 2025, which is a question that was unanswered.