A meeting tonight apparently

It is certainly strange that the club doesn't appear to be working harder to avoid CCJ's and as suppoprters, there ought to be some better feedback from the club as to why this sort of thing keeps happening.
However, wild speculation without any detail is not really going to help anyone.
Am I correct in thinking that if a company does not pay to lear the CCJ, the next step would be a winding up order, which would enforce payment or cause said company to cease trading ?

Nothing to worry about according to AG on twitter. 'Business' apparently. Time will tell i guess.

Players payments all been met and on time. All it was was a change in date of payment.

No fan likes seeing this when they log onto the forum and once is understandable but the more of these we have the better they need to explain them. We don't hear of the bigger sides going through this so why are we. The Club should understand that when these things happen, people will think the worst and comments about the old days will start to crop up more & more.

Of course we have a very tight budget here, that should go without saying, whether some people want to call that skint it's up to them but I wouldn't look at it that way. There's no way we can expect AG to be constantly sticking his own funds into the clubs like various other owners have to and I wouldn't want it that way tbh.

Hopefully what Uptoncat says is correct and it's all sorted but I do hope this is the end of them and we can just concentrate on winning the GF.

So it was the players who applied to the courts for the CCJ to be issued to the club. I find that a bit strange if true.

The problem is that AG is not as well off as it appeared and can't afford to keep the club afloat. Not all millionaire business men are actually millionaires and a millions pounds is not much money any way nowadays.

It's not "like" it's exactly the same.

I said this until I was blue in the face and continually got shot down by certain poster. The old regime didn't fail because they were incompetent or especially dodgy. They failed because eventually they were overwhelmed by a business simply incapable of sustaining itself at a SL level in it's present circumstances.

The line between success and failure is as narrow off the pitch as on. It is BV tah simply cannot produce the income required - it never could and it never will. NM will not offer drastically more revenue certainly not at the begining. However the difference will probably be enough for us to be on the right side of survival - just.

Until then we will limp into NM with the BOD having to borrow/lend to keep us afloat. If they manage it and it's not guaranteed the new stadium and a hopefully improved economy (an issue many on here don't seem to register) will see us through.

Before the AG protector brigade come along, I'm not blaming him or his people for anything - it was always an impossible ask for the last owner and it will remain so for this one for a few years yet.

Best of luck

No I didn't say or imply that. I was referring to an earlier post which implied players payments were late. That wasn't the case the payment date has just been changed by a couple of days. Hope that clears that up for you.

Nothing to worry about according to AG on twitter. 'Business' apparently. Time will tell i guess.

Must be budgeted for.

Thanks

See Supporters Trust thread

At least the new regime are TRYING to make improvements to a club that was on its knees. The old regime had years upon years to put a stand up AG did it in 6 month!