Quote bigalf="bigalf"Absolutely Not -
"The MUGA being the one element of the scheme
which is appropriate given that it is classed as an essential facility for outdoor sport and
recreation. The associated development with the MUGA (seating area, changing area
and parking) is however is classed as inappropriate development."
The only things permitted are the 2 outdoor pitches - nothing else.'"
That is a true statement in respect of the stadium element but it is not as simple as saying that the only two things permitted are the training pitches. The guidelines do allow for supporting buildings and infrastructure for these facilities. So changing rooms, car parking, indoor training facilities (gym) are considered permitted also. Of course the scale is the issue and therefore I think the majority of the stadium and car park is indeed outside of this, but that the majority of the community sports facilities could equally be considered as permitted.
Anyway, this might not be a problem. The actual objection to the MUGA has been very small, indeed the leading opposition group states on it's website that "We are not opposed to a stadium for Wakefield Wildcats."
Surely, they will not be so hypocritical as to change their minds (again) on such a clear and bold position! Of course not, they are not NIMBY's you know!
