Dewsbury is majestic compared to BV.

Give over, it's a tidy little ground, no where near SL standard I'd have thought.

Better parking, better standing area, full 4 G training pitch, not in an area frequented by car scratching scouts, bigger and better corporate facilities, better seating, better standing area, more cover, better floodlights, bigger better changing rooms, more toilets, modern, better sound system, better first aid station, easier access, modern entrance gates. other than that I just can not think of a reason why Dewsbury is a better ground. Oh yes its not in Wakefield , not owned by a landlord who doesn't give a toss about the rugby club and finally is not in WMDC area

Nah, we could carry on taking the mickey as it would only be a temporary move, well maybe

You had it sold to me, apart from the capacity is around 4000 ??
BV for all it's many faults is 7200 ??, almost double.

And doesn't have the minimum amount of seats, there might be a thousand maximum.

Easy to put right with a forward thinking, supportive council.

The floodlights would need improving, SL or the RL inspected Dewsbury's floodlights two years since and they weren't up to scratch.

Dewsbury would be ok for size because not half of the 'crowd' we get now would go! I would short term but long term I'd be done.
I won't support Dewsbury Trinity.

Heard from what I would describe as a reliable source at the weekend that: "Wakefield Trinity will never get a new stadium at Belle Vue". Make of that what you will.

I dont doubt it. I'm not expecting anything to happen at Belle Vue with regards to Wakefield Trinity. I'd say we are more likely to get a Costa and a KFC.

Might as well remove the words at Belle Vue too. It needs a perfect storm for it to come off and the longer it drags on the slimmer the slim possibility gets.