If, IF, he has set up a move without consent - it is exactly what I would expect from Agar as a response, consistent with his treatment of others. If you are not fully comitted to the club, you can ply your trade elsewhere.
This is all supposing the story is true.

Its not 100% but from a very good source so I expect it to be true, unfortunately.

its right, think we are off loading to save money

Wakefield Express 9th May 2013 - " Kyle Wood stepped in to plug the gap left by Sykes against Catalans on Saturday night and although admitting losing Sykes is a blow, Agar is confident his squad can deal with the loss.

“Woody has been sat patiently for a chance and I felt he did okay last week,” Agar commented.

“He came in with a couple of timely plays , had a hand in two if not three tries and I felt he played very soundly. He understands the role we want him to play off Timmy [Smith and while we lose Paul’s experience, as well as running game and kicking, judging on last week we covered it okay.

“I thought Lee [Smith kicked goals particularly well and I thought Woody, for his first game in there, has done a good job for us.”

Less than 3 weeks later and Kyle Wood has possibly left the club mid season.

It B rate, dunt worry, it will all B sorted, trust me

Bazzo. Bazzo what do you know?

'B' ok as 'Brad Dwyer' in exchange for Wood?

Maybe it's time for Agar to admit he was wrong to let Ellis go and re-sign him. If it's true that Wood has signed for Hudds, pride hasn't stopped them re-signing a player that they released or he moved on. If you think a player can do a job for you and he fits into your style of play, it's daft not to try and sign him. And from last year Ellis did both. Or do the club think the top eight is gone and will talk about planning for next season and giving the likes of Cowling, Walshaw and Goulding a go.

I would welcome Ellis back but two things:
1. Would he want to come back after the way he was treated?
2. What makes you think Fev would let him go?

Fair point, but maybe it was pointed out to him that he would not be the starting hooker when Aiton recovered for the start of this season.Possibly then, the decision to leave was Ellis's. Unfortunately the coach couldn't or didn't want to see that you can play both Aiton and Ellis on the field at the same time. Possibly wouldn't want to pay a transfer fee for a player they probably gave the option to leave less than a year ago. Hopefully his contract would have a release clause in it.

If this is the case then things are worse than we thought. Can't see him being a big earner.