why are we letting jk sign players for next year as in penny and jessie

so our 3 highest paid players leave...................and anyone thinks the problem is the coach???????????????

nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

ageed weve taken boredom to another level

not technically correct old bean cooke came before brough left!"

got me a beer thoug, i was in rhodes 3 weeks ago and i have a wakey beach towel, a bloke came over and gave me a cold mithos beer for no reason, honest, i said whats that for, he says im a robin mate!

top bloke!

I am a great advocate of john kears, he has done stirling work for what is a terminally crap club, however Morrison at 7 last week was a low point for me, maybe he's lost the plot.
I believe that the club is so far up the creek, concentrating solely, on the ground issue that we are rotten to the core.
Having said that 3 wins on the bounce and we're all bouncing!!!! The only thing is I can't see us getting another win, let alone 3!!!
Next week could well be the acid test!

While I understand the frustration of the poor form, I don't get the resentment towards the efforts getting a new ground is breeding.

Even if the RL was mindblowingly brilliant with no ground there is no SL place.

If the grounds comes off i'd gladly accept a poor season as collateral.

Agree,someone said on a other thread we've put our eggs in 1 basket concentrating on the stadium,but as far as i can see that is the only way we will be playing Superleague past next year.But really the fact that we need to get a stadium shouldn't change the level of performance on the pitch.JK and the players can't affect the stadium decision,they can only get on with playing rugby.So saying we are too busy concentrating on the stadium shouldn't change the results on the pitch

We have it seems.

Without any doubt it is.

Should have no bearing on performance at all.

But somethings caused loss of form within the team and coaching staff IMO.

ok mate , honest opinion no biases. our season changed when we lost 3 players. 1 through stupidity 1 because he was an absolute plonker who never intended to stay and the other, probably the main reason was brough. the club had been trying to reach a deal with danny for 9 months. he had a few deals on the table. each time the club met his demands he increased them. the last offer he had was exactly what he asked for and still backed off. there were secret meetings i suppose but not at belle vue. danny tried to fry a few fish and finished up where he is now. he never intended imo staying at wakefield, he had his own reasons for going to hudds and if as you say you know then i am sure you will know what i am saying is the truth. jk did his upmost to keep him at wakefield. as i am sure you are aware he rates him highly. we got what we could for him. the best deal possible at the time. cooke was nothing to do with it. we got him on the cheap. end of story. i would have liked danny to stay but that wasn't to be. i support the players that want to play for us however i do have a little smile when i hear the rumours at the galpharm about brown, robinson, drew and 1 or 2 others not hitting it off

You are entitiled to your opinion about the team / coaching / management / etc., but please get your facts right on music before continuing - thanks

Was it really the best deal when you look at our season since??

Id rather we'd have negotiated for 6 months and then got shot while still standing some chance of getting a replacement. Anyhow, its been discussed to death and whats done is done. We have what we have which unfortunately is simply not good enough.

correct just lets support the lads we've got