Centre half for Manchester United in the 70s, a bit of useless information

Common sense, if a player was clear through and the ref ran straight at him and collided with him would you say the ref had a right to be there? If a team broke and he managed to get himself right in between the supporting player the try scoring pass would’ve gone to.

There’s a right to be where he wants....with common sense. He shouldn’t be stopping defenders stopping tries because they’ve had to divert around him or stop in their tracks.

You're obviously not going to let this go.

Nope.

Are you trying to suggest Parcell isn't at fault?
There are plenty of times an attacking player runs towards a ref to cause the defense a problem. I'm certain Parcell has done it in his role as Hooker.
It's still the defense responsibility to not touch the ref.

It's just a rule you are going to have to accept.

the guys argumentative, one of those kids at school that was never ready when he was bowled out at cricket and always wanted a sally

It’s a discussion board with a key point being to debate things and a number of Wakefield posters have posted just as much on this topic with some including yourself resorting to insults or mocking. Yet I’m argumentative just because you don’t like or agree with my view.

thank you for backing up my post up yet again, if you think for one minute that were obsessed in getting Parcel banned you are deluded he doesn't pose a threat,
as for the collisions with the refs, once could be accidental, twice is stupid, three times definitely requires action upon and that's within 2 games especially when the first one was within his vision and he couldn't of even of stopped the try only prevent a closer kick in which my gran could of converted it.
carry on your complaining as you are just continuing to make your self into the clown

I wish to offer you a job.

I have a hole in my back garden that needs digging