Seating is cheaper than seats?

You've lost me.

I guess he means to make that flat piece of concrete in to terrace requires a lot of building up, so reasonably skilled labour and a lot of materials.
Temporary seating is bought as is and plonked on the floor with no alterations

Lost myself, I meant temp seating is cheaper than terracing.

Correct.

Also the flats themselves are temporary constructions with no real foundations. So building a permanent terrace right up to them may be problematic. Maybe I’m wrong and there is a way, but what I do know is that temp seating is cheap to buy and install and because it would be fairly shallow would have very few safety requirements. Terracing would need to be far stronger, need crush barriers etc.

Fair point. I did wonder if crush barriers may be an issue but some of the points you make about it being cheaper make sense.

Ultimately if we can increase capacity by a few hundred then this should get utilised for our big games vs likes of Leeds etc when I expect we will sell out.

Talking about seats actually. You may know but I had a brief look at the handbook recently and it mentioned that hospitality is to have a physical barrier to receive points…

Our hospitality seating has no physical barrier as such however it is separated by a walkway. I’m just wondering if this is classed as a physical barrier being a break in the seating?

I remember JM talking about that. It doesn't need to be major fixed wall. Just something to identify the difference. I'd guess we'd put hand rails down the side if needed

Thanks PT.

Leaving that one a bit late in the day. Would be a shame if we dropped points on a simple barrier like that. Maybe because we haven’t done it we perhaps don’t need to or maybe it’s something in the pipeline. I suppose you could put a few posts up and have a connecting chain running fl down the sides for a very cheap option. You could open and close it off when needed I guess.

I suppose the club would need to know what img define as a physical barrier. If it’s a physical gap, stewards enforcing then that’s easily done but if it is in fact something tangible then I would think Ellis would be all over that.

Just always wondered as would be a shame to lose points on something we actually have but for a technicality.

I agree.

I know they have opportunities to meet RFL to discuss so hopefully it's all under control.
Personally I'd allocate IMG strategy to someone as a role, not just Ellis looking. He's a busy guy and this needs someone in the detail.

Absolutely agree but I firmly believe Ellis will have had a consultant or someone go through the detailed handbook in detail and identify opportunities like these barriers where we could not only gain points but also avoid losing points.

I would actually hope they’ve consulted Mynards as he was heavily involved in the last one where we scored quite well last year.

Totally agree about a person dealing with it. I’d certainly have someone going through it with a fine tooth comb and getting regular clarification from IMG in things like this barrier.

While we’re discussing hand rail’s I’m reliably informed that to comply with IMG requirements, the blue/purple hospitality seats are to have hand rails down the outside seats to cordon off from the none hospitality section. This work will have to be done before the grades are announced end of October.

We have been discussing that on the last page. There’s no more reliably informed than the handbook itself and it’s in there. Expected as much and I’m sure that Ellis will get it done.

I do however suspect that it won’t need to be before October announcement. It will I believe need to be done sooner before the club I assume has its IMG grading visit where it will be scrutinised against the handbook. This is when it will need to be installed for (so not much time at all).

It doesn't say hand rail it says 'physical barrier'.
They will need to clarify what that means.

Quite right, I’m just thoughtful that a handrail would be beneficial to quite a few people including me when climbing those steps.

I think the flats have served us well in the past, what 25 years or so, and have brought a lot of revenue into the club.

They do look better since they have been freshened up.

I do recall earlier in the the season what ME said about his plans for the west terrace, and the part above the covered terrace. If my memory serves me right, he said a rooftop area with hospitality there. I haven't heard anything changing on that front, so I can only presume that it is still the long term plan.

If that is the case, then could some of the hospitality side be moving from there to the west terrace, or will this be extra boxes etc.

If it is moving, I wouldn't be surprised to see something further down the line on the south end which is part hospitality, and part stand for supporters.

Exciting times ahead

Hospitality isn't really in the flats now.
The players area is there and boxes for sponsors.
There is obviously still facility to do it but I'd say the Neil Fox Stand covers what used to be there.
West stand is all about supports for me.
Clearly Ellis knows more about business than me but I'm not on board with the rooftop.
I'd either have home stand like Hull KR for the length of the area or a seating area with media area above.