Oh give over, we are talking about a 10k capacity stadium, are you seriously calling that parking provision

I was trying to come up with a similar set up at another club, who basically flattened old 'stands' and built what was required in it's place, without actually moving to a completely new site and start from scratch. The only one I can think of is Widnes? They have a main road running past one side, fairly similar to Doncaster rd loosely. They have a couple of pubs, and housing pretty close by, although i'm not sure how close exactly they are as compared to Belle Vue. I suppose it shows it can be done, it's the only one I can think of that is remotely similar to Belle Vue?

The thing about parking is maybe not so much that it is required, but rather that it would be required to sell the hospitality boxes. I would imagine for many businesses wanting to invest in corporate hospitality, parking is a must. "Meet us outside the kebab shop on Donny Road" isn't a great start to an evening of corporate entertainment.

As for the rest, let's just what the architects can do, if it ever gets that far. I would be quite happy if we can get to the point of working out how to make it fit, because it would be a damn sight further on than we are now! I'm not convinced Belle Vue has a smaller footprint than the Halliwell Jones, and I could see one bigger stand being built of all-seating, with the corporate stuff, and the rest being standing. Imagine the Halliwell Jones without the seats behind the sticks.

Do they, I don't know of any that don't have some parking. I admit it may be very limited but it's some.

I think it is required if it's classified as a new development - if it's a re-development then possibly not.

If you are worried about parking I believe two sites owned by the council had been identified

Just because you don't see it doesn't mean it isn't there. However you're right in the sense that it's pretty much irrelevant because it won't get built because it was never meant to be built.

Well of course they have just like they identified Thornes College which they didn't own and NM which didn't happen. Forgive me if I'm less than impressed.

Also why not build the stadium on this land earmarked for parking - just an idea.

You are not the only one with friends of friends plus I believe the planning threshold for temporary car parking is less than a stadium especially where there isn’t one at the moment.
I am sure you will come up with another avenue of objection based on an artist’s impression. What about the Wakefield logo which is clearly too big for the area it is located

Nice try, yep I'm the bad guy on this subject and you're the hero - can't see many buying into you being a hero - me as the bad guy, probably.

Big enough to accommodate Trinity? In locations in Wakefield, or the Wakefield District?

Ask the club they know the areas allocated for parking.
I think Vastman is a manipulator who has sadly alienated a lot of supporters who no longer post leaving just a few of his entourage who agree with his many questionable assumptions.
He now supports our relocation away from that nasty council because that is more important than the possibility that the club could lose its SL status
Don’t bother reverting to type by trying to insult me because I really don’t care there is more to worry about in this conservative controlled country than what you think

Newmarket?

Sorry but I have no idea where you are referring too- areas allocated for parking???