Very grown up, yes I did forget but I’m sure he was gutted as I’m sure was everyone else involved

We have finally hit the 2,000. Support for the ground redevelopment application.

Comments Received: 2014 Objections: 10 Supporting: 2001
Let’s hope we don’t have to wait too long for the application to be heard at the planning meeting.

Yeah this in bold, every time I drive up Ashgap lane in Normy and it comes into view I end up shaking my head, if only we knew then what we do now?icon_sad.gif

Could it be possible that one day everything that was said a swag meetings with box .RW etc be made public or is it too sensitive?

I wasn't at most of the later ones but basically its nothing that wasn't said on here through the years. Box can't be touched, he said a lot but promised nothing. What you want to know is what was said between Rodney Walker, YC and the Council, many of whose meetings SWAG was not in attendance. It goes pear shape when SWAG moved over to the Trust and lost control to RW. TRB and IA did there best but were constantly undermined and outflanked. It's those years where the damage was done and the chances of finding out what was said are nil unless it goes to court but that's just somewhere else to lie to these people.

MC and JM have got it about right now having finally got rid of Walker and co and having a stake via the ground. It's not much but it's better than before. As I say all at SWAG did our best but the club are ones to drive this forward now.

Regarding our planning application, is there anyone on here, that knows about how applications are listed for hearing at the council application meetings?.
I have looked at the January council meeting, there are 2 applications being heard.
One application received and validated 3rd March 2020. The other, received and validated July 2020.
If these are typical of waiting times, then I think we’ll be lucky if our application received 24th Nov, validated 16th Dec, is heard, let alone approved, before the end of the 2021 season. Therefore little chance of any work starting this year.

No idea, email the club, if MC can tell you he probably will, seems pretty open.

Usually a residential development, which is relatively more contentious, allows three months from submission to hearing. I guess that would be a good timescale to work on. As ever there are always delays and with planners and consultees working from home it may prolong matters.

As long as the club get all the required info bottomed out (phase 2 SI and remediation strategy to deal with the contamination for example) in a timely manner then it shouldn't take too long. Same with the NM application.

Constant chasing is required but they seem to have have instructed Pegasus who will push it.