Well personally I thought Moore did well, did everything a prop should do. Ran hard and run onto the ball. Dan Smith, Paul Sykes and Lucas Walshaw did well. And Ali before the sin binning.

Overall i think all the players did well and will stand them in good stead for the start of the season. Brian Noble was sat near us , obviously come to weigh up the oposition.

Taking into account the oppossition i thought Moore, Smith and Trout showed up well in the forwards.
I though the replacement hooker looked sharp (Maskill? #22) and Briscoe also.
As ever we looked like we didn't know was going off at K.O and looked like another try could have been conceded as we failed to field a bog standard kick off. This needs some attention.
Washbrook did OK at 6, but i hope we won't see him there again this season.
Sykes did OK too and took his try well, just needs to sharpen up a bit.
I was pleased to see so many youngsters do so well in the second half too.
Reasons to be cheerful and reasons to be concerned. 6.5/10

Because that's his opinion?, which is as valid as anybody else's

Except when his opinion is quite obviously wrong. Richard Moore was our best prop by a mile. Of concern to me was the performace of Andy Raleigh who I hope is holding something back for the SL games.

maybe my eyesight is better than others, maybe others weren't watching closely, or maybe as above I have a different opinion which maybe different from other and in a minority but it is an opinion never the less

He wasn't but I respect your opinion

I've no idea how long he played for yesterday but apart from 15 mins against Fev that was his first game after surgery. He's feeling good and looking forward to the season, that's all I know.

Is that so

I was more questioning him as to why he thought his opinion was so correct when it differs so much from everyone else's. I fear more for his physical than mental health and suggest a visit to SpecSavers ASAP or he will continue to look daft, and surely you can't want that?