Mate we are Wakefield so Hendo is all you will get

You see you have to remember we are Fevs major feeder club and Hendo is only one of several players in our squad who we are preparing for the future challenge of Championship rugby

I meant 'lose' forwards as in forwards that lose!

Bibb, Pitts, Winterstein and Moore all available aren't they? Form or not, they have to be better than too many small guys.

can see the dilemma thoough, change a team that posted a huge win????
your damned if you do and you lose!!

whereas keep same team ....er your damned if you lose!

basically you lose your damned, you win your a master tactician.

no. what good coaches do is they assess the opposition as well as how their own players are playing and pick a team accordingly. they should be proactive not reactive. bradford are big....drew and latu are comparitively small. we had more appropriate players on the sidelines. this shouldn't take hindsight to realise

we beat the worst team in sl history weve got to pick a team imo to play the opposition and if that means dropping them or putting them on the bench so be it

yeah i agree thought selection today was a bit strange but realise why he did it, must have thought we could run the big pack around, and we didnt.

also thought we sort of relaxed when we had seen off newton and left rinaldi all the space in the world.

soz for agreeing with you mopsey, im not myself tonight!

but we couldnt get any go forward to run them around, we then end up too small and get smashed up the middle

thats twice ive ageeed, dont push it!

I don't understand the issue. We don't have 3 hookers playing.
We have two hookers who rotate with each other and another player who normally plays hooker now playing in the back row.

It's not a matter of how many people have played hooker before it's how they play in the game.
That's like saying we play with an extra prop cos Snitch used to play there or an extra centre cos JD played there.

Saying all that, if we have too many small men in the pack it isn't going to work so if we need bigger men then we bring them in.
No one complains that Ferguson is too small. He plays a style that suits his physical size. I guess JK is trying to do the same with Latu.

Pitts and Bibb have played well but have let themselves down when the pressure was on. They needed a rest and confidence builder.

If size was the only thing we'd have all the props playing together. Wigan implemented a plan that broke us down the middle. Giants did the same and Bulls did it to a lesser extent today. I'd say it is more about defensive structure than size of the player.

The try under the post for Sykes at the Trin supporters end showed the problem today. Every tackle was made but they got the ball away to a player making an effort to back up....we didn't show the same effort to cover across and support the tackler.

you've answered your own question there.

we do realise that latu has been converted to the back row, just that by doing so we are too small against a pack as big as bradfords. easy really

The blind side was lazy in defense all day today - they repeatedly clocked off when the ball went the other way, and when the Bradford forwards (all with offloads) got the ball out and it came back they where exposed.