I really don't understand the animosity, I was asking genuine questions.

Your propensity for being a tool obviously precedes you

not so much as your inability to contribute to a meaningful conversation

You didn't ask a question, you gave a statement regarding WT not being sl on merit.

you've only read the page you were on, prior to that I was asking about your owner, ground improvements etc. It was only when snowie said "we'll never finish bottom of SL" that I said no fan OF ANY CLUB, can guarantee that, and that SL and RL in general can be a difficult business for ANY CLUB.

I agree and the questions you raised were answered reasonably, however the animosity came when you gave the statement regarding not being in sl on merit.
ps You're not the Fax CEO are you , he still hasn't apologised.

Try reading back through the many post you've made, that'll give you the answer Standee.

my post was accurate, if Crusaders hadn't withdrawn then there wouldn't have been a space available in SL next season (rightly or wrongly, but the RFL were never going to boot Crusaders out)??

Your post is accurate [sizeIYO[/size and only yours.

It's 'accuracy' is based on the assumption that our bid was weaker than that of the remaining teams. I'd suggest the onus is on you to prove that, else it is pure assertion.

I'd also put up a counter that, as the withdrawal of Crusaders was based on doubts over their ability to fulfil their franchise bid, our bid had more merit that of the Crusaders.

the Crusaders bid wasn't in the final running though, it was withdrawn.

as I have said, it really doesn't matter, you're in, and that is really that.

You are making the assumption that there were 13 better 'applications' than the WT one (taking into account Widnes), but we know otherwise. HTH

The point isn't about whether we are in or not, it was about your claim that we didn't merit being in.

I acknowledged the withdrawal of the Crusaders bid. I also know that ultimately [iyour claim[/i that we were not in on merit doesn't matter, as the fact you aren't providing evidence to your spurious statement suggests you are clearly not party to the RFL's decision-making process.

What a load of crap!

It's impossible to have a meaningful conversation with a pompous bigot who's sanctimonious edicts are expressed in a torrent condescending statements.